[1387] in linux-security and linux-alert archive
[linux-security] Re: BoS: hmm..seen this one?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hynek Med)
Fri Jan 17 02:23:04 1997
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 15:17:32 +0100 (MET)
From: Hynek Med <xmedh02@manes.vse.cz>
To: linux-security@redhat.com
Resent-From: linux-security@redhat.com
Reply-To: linux-security@redhat.com
> Intel:
> rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.redhat.com/updates/4.0/i386/util-linux-2.5-29.i386.rpm
>
> Alpha:
> rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.redhat.com/updates/4.0/axp/util-linux-2.5-29.axp.rpm
>
> SPARC:
> rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.redhat.com/updates/4.0/sparc/util-linux-2.5-29.sparc.rpm
>
> All of these packages have been signed with Red Hat's PGP key.
But when you do this, don't forget to upgrade your pam to pam-0.50-22,
otherwise you run into problems - you won't be able to login (thank God
ssh worked). I think util-linux should have this dependence on
pam-0.50-22 or higher..
Hynek
--
Hynek Med, xmedh02@manes.vse.cz
