[9392] in linux-scsi channel archive
Re: Adaptec dies after powerloss of a drive
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthias Andree)
Mon Aug 14 14:41:38 2000
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 20:35:12 +0200
From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
To: linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
Message-ID: <20000814203512.V6878@lxMA.mediaways.net>
Mail-Followup-To: linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10008141646450.5376-100000@zeus.fh-brandenburg.de>; from peschke@fh-brandenburg.de on Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 16:54:05 +0200
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Martin Peschke wrote:
>
> The new eh-strategy takes a device offline, if all resets did not cure the
> failed device. I do not think that a fourced unmount happens. sd.c simply
> blocks further access (-ENODEV) , doesn't it?
Not yet, but it would REALLY be useful so as to hook existing processes
somewhere (they're stuck anyways), but not have new processes stick.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
