[8971] in linux-scsi channel archive
Re: NCR5380.c: IO request dead lock within the _main() function?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (christian Montanari)
Sat Jun 10 02:23:42 2000
From: christian Montanari <christian@montanari.f9.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 07:20:52 +0100 (BST)
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: christian@montanari.f9.co.uk (christian Montanari),
linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <E12yhFi-0003fG-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Message-ID: <14657.56549.646400.676594@gedeon.ailsa.co.uk>
Alan Cox writes:
> > OK, lets say... Is it worth it? Are they many duds (I am not one) out
> > there trying to use this puny card for heavy transfer (interrupts do
> > not work) by polling the driver's addresses? etc...
>
> Interrupts work on most of those cards actually. There is even someone making
> PCI variants of these horrors!!
>
Can I then unsolder the PNP selector on the card, would it it wise to try?
Christian.
PS. for the 'diff -u' I should first try a bit more my stuff on
transfer, and send it when it is cleaner... I am not a scsi guru, but I
can understand phases (states) and interrupts!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
