[8439] in linux-scsi channel archive
Re: Ultra 160 adapters?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alan Cox)
Mon Mar 20 23:55:11 2000
To: mjacob@feral.com
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 03:19:19 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10003201847000.93096-100000@semuta.feral.com> from "Matthew Jacob" at Mar 20, 2000 06:56:23 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E12XFCT-000479-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> hasn't been my main thing, and I've never really *quite* got the locking right
> for 2.2.X and I really haven't kept up with the 2.3 tree, so your guess is as
> good as mine as to what "Yet" really means.
I never got the qlogic 2100 stable under extreme load with 2.2. The same
torture config with the scsi layer changes in 2.3.x doesn't randomly explode
and reboot. The driver hasnt changed. Draw your own conclusions.
The 2.3.x scsi layer changes and EH changes appear to have fixed a lot of
deep seated scsi weirdness.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
