[8330] in linux-scsi channel archive
Re: Problem
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Veteikis)
Wed Mar 8 21:30:13 2000
From: Mark Veteikis <mark@iphase.com>
Message-Id: <200003090041.SAA04547@hera.Iphase.COM>
To: mjacob@feral.com
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 18:41:52 -0600 (CST)
Cc: sjbuller@us.ibm.com, eric@estinc.com (Eric Lee Green),
linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10003081445080.78286-100000@semuta.feral.com> from "Matthew Jacob" at Mar 08, 2000 02:59:30 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> But this thread started out with comparisons to Solaris, and frankly, Solaris
> (out of the box) isn't in any better shape than Linux is (which I pointed out)
> with respect to FC midlayer stuff, or storage management (with the default end
> user product). It's only when you add some adult commercial products (like
> Veritas stuff) that this stuff becomes managable.
Matt,
The comparison to Solaris came about because I referenced a SunServer
article talking about the maturity of Linux and SANs. In fact, the author
never talked about Solaris, hope I was misleading.
In fact he was positive about LInux in general. I wish I could have posted the
article, but as before I couldn't find a URL on their website.
--
Mark Veteikis mark@iphase.com 1-214-654-5257
Interphase Corp. 13800 Senlac Dallas Tx. 75234
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
