[8328] in linux-scsi channel archive
Re: Problem
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Jacob)
Wed Mar 8 20:49:09 2000
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 16:52:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com
To: Mark Veteikis <mark@iphase.com>
Cc: sjbuller@us.ibm.com, Eric Lee Green <eric@estinc.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <200003090041.SAA04547@hera.Iphase.COM>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10003081651360.78286-100000@semuta.feral.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> >
> > But this thread started out with comparisons to Solaris, and frankly, Solaris
> > (out of the box) isn't in any better shape than Linux is (which I pointed out)
> > with respect to FC midlayer stuff, or storage management (with the default end
> > user product). It's only when you add some adult commercial products (like
> > Veritas stuff) that this stuff becomes managable.
>
> Matt,
>
> The comparison to Solaris came about because I referenced a SunServer
> article talking about the maturity of Linux and SANs. In fact, the author
> never talked about Solaris, hope I was misleading.
Well, you were :-)....
>
> In fact he was positive about LInux in general. I wish I could have posted the
> article, but as before I couldn't find a URL on their website.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
