[8234] in linux-scsi channel archive
Re: recovery behaviour with 1 bad + 1 good drive (aic7xxx)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthias Andree)
Fri Feb 25 09:33:46 2000
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Cc: Ricky Beam <jfbeam@bluetopia.net>, linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: Doug Ledford's message of "Thu, 24 Feb 2000 15:13:56 -0500"
From: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
Date: 25 Feb 2000 15:31:52 +0100
Message-ID: <m3snyhmjzb.fsf@emma1.emma.line.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> writes:
> Are you sure tagged queueing is actually being used on those drives? They
> should all be defective according to my information. I would be curious to
> know just how sure you are that these drives are using tagged queueing.
I recall a Micropolis Tomahawk 4345WS failing tagged command queueing
with a 2842VL (AIC7770) while TCQ was fine with a Tekram DC-390U
(SYM53C875). Not that it matters.
Just my 2 Pf.
--
Matthias Andree
Hi! I'm the infamous .signature virus!
Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
