[8222] in linux-scsi channel archive
Re: recovery behaviour with 1 bad + 1 good drive (aic7xxx)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ricky Beam)
Thu Feb 24 22:53:36 2000
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 20:53:40 -0500 (EST)
From: Ricky Beam <jfbeam@bluetopia.net>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <38B59104.8C747119@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10002242050150.12259-100000@beaker>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Doug Ledford wrote:
>Are you sure tagged queueing is actually being used on those drives? They
>should all be defective according to my information. I would be curious to
>know just how sure you are that these drives are using tagged queueing.
Unless your AIC driver is lying, it's on. And there is a noticable diff
in performance with the alteration to the scsi code to enable queuing.
You're welcome to login to the box(s) and see for yourself.
--Ricky
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
