[6064] in linux-scsi channel archive
No subject found in mail header
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (owner-linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu)
Thu Mar 11 02:34:52 1999
In-Reply-To: <199903110417.PAA30642@vindaloo.atnf.CSIRO.AU>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 14:27:23
From: owner-linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
To: unlisted-recipients: ;(no To-header on input)
-0000=?us-ascii?Q?_(/etc/localtimep=97=12=08|=F7=FF=BF=3Dm =08?=
Reply-To: peterw@dascom.com
From: Peter Waltenberg <peterw@dascom.com>
To: Richard Gooch <rgooch@atnf.csiro.au>
Subject: Re: SCSI generic interface addition
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
Sender: owner-linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Maybe it's because I'm down under and I'm too far away to come over
> and meet in person with the inner circle, so people don't feel I'm a
> real person with something to contribute.
>
> BTW, Eric: I'm not directing this at you. I'm describing the general
> pattern I've seen about this topic.
>
Um Richard, part of the problem could well be that anyone who emails you
directly finds they are automatically in your kill file and then decides
"Ahh **** it".
If you've changed that, I applogise, but since you are getting a copy
of this email directly, I guess I'll find out. It probably hasn't helped some of
the flames on Linux-kernel either.
FWIW I agree that devfs is "A good thing (tm)", and solves a lot more problems than
it creates.
Peter
----------------------------------
E-Mail: Peter Waltenberg <peterw@dascom.com>
Date: 11-Mar-99
Time: 14:22:18
This message was sent by XFMail
----------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
