[5342] in linux-scsi channel archive
Re: Dumb question: Which is "better" SCSI or IDE disks? Fibre Channel of course!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gregory Maxwell)
Mon Dec 7 18:15:22 1998
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 10:39:19 -0500 (EST)
From: Gregory Maxwell <linker@z.ml.org>
To: Agus Budy Wuysang <supes-1@usa.net>
cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Leonard Zhang System Administrator ISD RVIB <leonardz@rvib2.rvib.org.au>,
leighton@mail.imake.com, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu,
linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <366B5AE8.938F0D84@usa.net>
On Mon, 7 Dec 1998, Agus Budy Wuysang wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > I think currently spinning SCSI hard disks on the world, either in servers
> > > or workstation, either in Unix/Linux or NT, is 50-pin old guys, no DPT disk
> >
> > And as my stats showed for real work even old 5400 rpm fast scsi on a
> > now discontinued adapter (the BT946) beats current UDMA IDE for real world
> > compiles. You "think". I've "measured"
>
> If it were supported under Linux :)
If what was supported? UDMA is supported just fine.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
