[4300] in linux-scsi channel archive
Re: SV: Upgraded to 2.1.107 ... almost succesfully - Follow up.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brendan Miller)
Mon Jul 6 13:59:10 1998
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 10:40:00 -0700
From: Brendan Miller <brmiller@xenon.kudzu.gammalink.com>
To: Brian Schau <bsc@fleggaard.dk>
Cc: "'linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu'" <linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu>
Reply-To: Brendan Miller <brmiller@wco.com>
In-Reply-To: <91F2D41BEDADD1119DCC0060B06D7BD10A0C74@dserver.fleggaard.dk>; from Brian Schau on Mon, Jul 06, 1998 at 06:42:53PM +0200
> Questions: Are there problems with the adaptec-driver in 2.1.107? Are
> there problems with the scsi-driver in 2.1.107?
Yes. Actually, if you look through the posts to this list, Doug Ledford
said that, in fact, there are negotiation problems with *all* 5.0.xx versions
of the aic7xxx code. He's madly working on 5.1.0 right now to solve these
problems and to add Ultra2 support. Go back and read the thread
"Re: Trouble with (aic7xxx)5.0.19 driver on Linux" if you still have it,
or monitor ftp://ftp.dialnet.net/pub/linux/aic7xxx/. Doug also said he
would post to linux-scsi and aic7xxx@freebsd.org when he had something
completed for us to try.
But this scbptr SELTO stuff is known for a lot of people in 2.0.34 and
some in 2.1.10x. I have my Adaptec chain unplugged right now as I
anxiously away Doug's new driver. (All my critical stuff is on a BusLogic
BT-958.)
Brendan Miller
P.S. Doug, we're prayin' for you!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
