[4073] in linux-scsi channel archive
Re: Apologies to Eric and Leonard (aic7xxx_host->host_no persists)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leonard N. Zubkoff)
Sat Jun 6 11:14:33 1998
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 1998 08:09:12 -0700
From: "Leonard N. Zubkoff" <lnz@dandelion.com>
To: tigran@aivazian.demon.co.uk
CC: eric@andante.jic.com, linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu,
linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980606120454.485A-100000@perseo.homenet> (message
from Tigran Aivazian on Sat, 6 Jun 1998 12:07:23 +0100 (BST))
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 1998 12:07:23 +0100 (BST)
From: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.demon.co.uk>
Dear Erik and Leonard,
I apologize for my previous message - you both were absolutely right and I
was absolutely wrong. Your idea works fine - I just tested it.
Originally, I thought you were suggesting to remove the whole decrement
statement, not just the conditional if().
The *only* part that I suggested for removal was the !scsi_loadable_module_flag
test in that if. The remaining claue should be left in.
> On Mon, 1 Jun 1998, Leonard N. Zubkoff wrote:
> > modules are removed in the reverse order that they were installed. I also
> > recall a proposal to keep track of where a driver module had been installed and
> > re-install at the same host number if possible. An interesting experiment
> > would be to remove the module test in:
> >
> > if (max_scsi_hosts == next_scsi_host && !scsi_loadable_module_flag)
> > max_scsi_hosts--;
> >
> > from hosts.c and see if the system operates properly.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
