[3757] in linux-scsi channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: LINUX source code

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Zlatko Calusic)
Fri Apr 24 09:38:04 1998

To: Ian Stirling <root@mauve.demon.co.uk>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu
Reply-To: Zlatko.Calusic@CARNet.hr
From: Zlatko Calusic <Zlatko.Calusic@CARNet.hr>
Date: 	24 Apr 1998 13:50:51 +0200
In-Reply-To: Ian Stirling's message of "Thu, 23 Apr 1998 22:45:54 +0100 (BST)"

Ian Stirling <root@mauve.demon.co.uk> writes:

> <snip>
> > I found that WDC AC22000L IDE UDMA 2GB drive (5400rpm) is slightly
> > _faster_ than Fujitsu M2954ESP UltraSCSI 4GB drive (7200!rpm). How can
> > it be???
> > 
> > My setup: Linux v2.1.97, glibc, P166MMX, 32MB RAM, Adaptec 2940UW.
> > 
> > SCSI:
> >               -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
> >               -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
> > Machine    MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU  /sec %CPU
> >           100  1614 76.3  5607 27.7  2440 23.4  1638 71.2  6583 25.3  92.4  3.9
> >                           ^^^^                             ^^^^
> 
> Ahh, but look at the seeks                                              ^
> 
> > UDMA:
> >               -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
> >               -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
> > Machine    MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU  /sec %CPU
> >           100  1564 74.2  7443 42.2  2815 28.8  1766 76.5  8092 35.2  69.8  2.6
> >                           ^^^^                             ^^^^
> > 
>                                                                          ^
> 
> The rotational speed has little to do with the transfer speed, unless
> all other things are exactly equal.
> What are you using to measure that? 
> I get 10.5Mb/sec using quantum bigfoot 8Gb, (hdparm -t) and my brother reports
> 15Mbish with a fuji drive.
> Both TX motherboards.
> 
> 

Well, yes, SCSI drive is seeking faster, but shouldn't higher
rotational speed also read data faster from the media?

What bothers me is that many people report speeds of >= 10MB/s with
their drives (even cheaper IDE ones) and it seems I can't get more
than around 7MB/s with so called Enterprise UW SCSI drive with big
capacity and high rotational speed???

I made above tests with "bonnie" program. Altavista is your friend. :)

Testing with hdparm -t:

{atlas} [~]# hdparm -t /dev/sda

/dev/sda:
 Timing buffered disk reads:  32 MB in  3.71 seconds = 8.63 MB/sec
{atlas} [~]# hdparm -t /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 Timing buffered disk reads:  32 MB in  3.70 seconds = 8.65 MB/sec
{atlas} [~]# hdparm -t /dev/sda

??????

I probably don't need to mention that the SCSI drive costs much more
than the IDE one. SCSI controller is another story. :)

Bye!
-- 
Posted by Zlatko Calusic           E-mail: <Zlatko.Calusic@CARNet.hr>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
	 Reputation: what others are not thinking about you.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post