| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
To: Tall cool one <ice@mama.indstate.edu> Cc: david@dlomas.com, linux-tape@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu From: Claus-Justus Heine <claus@momo.math.rwth-aachen.de> Date: 01 Oct 1997 01:12:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: Tall cool one's message of Tue, 30 Sep 1997 11:49:46 -0500 Tall cool one <ice@mama.indstate.edu> writes: > David Lomas <david@dlomas.com> writes: > > Some time ago I attempted to build "dump" as in Sun OS "sump" or Solaris > > "ufsdump" for kernel 2.0.0. > > > > Since the "dump" archives that I've foung haven't been up-dated since > > (generally) 1995, I though that I'd ask specifically whether or not > > anyone's using dump. > > I've used BSD dump ported to Linux to restore a dump tape off a Sequent > system done in '95, restored perfectly. Dump hasn't changed it's format in > a million years. I find that dump is a lot nicer when it comes time to > restore, since I usually only need to restore one or two files at a time. > > > How did you build it with specific reference to the newer e2fs progs > > libraries with 2.0.? > > First get the latest, dump-0.4.tar.gz off of sunsite and also get the > latest e2fsprogs (1.06 I beleive). Follow the instructions on how to build > the e2fsprogs with shared libraries: No, at least version 1.10, if not newer. If I remember right then some bugs in 1.09 were the reason for the 1.10 release, so better don't use 1.09 (from memory, I'm not an ext2 expert) Cheers Claus
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |