[2011] in linux-scsi channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Intel TX chipset not yet supported by linux?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert Johannes)
Sun Jun 15 15:42:32 1997

Date: 	Sun, 15 Jun 1997 12:22:21 -0500
From: Robert Johannes <rjohanne@piper.hamline.edu>
To: linux-scsi@vger.rutgers.edu

Hello, 
those of you who gave me advice and have been following my shopping
spree on building a system from components might be interested in
knowing the final tentative results.  I've ended up buying a supermicro
atx motherboard with the TX chipset, 64 megs of 12ns sdram which was
only selling at about $20 more than EDO 60ns(hopefully linux won't make
a fuss about that); the processor is the regular pentium 200/mmx, and I
already had an ibm and adaptec 2940u scsi devices; I know alot of you
advised on buslogic, but during a mail order spree, I got caught up in a
tight situation with one company that I had ordered the buslogic BT-948,
and ended up buying the adaptec 2940u for about 35 dollars less than the
BT-948 (which is unusual because the 2940's usually sell for much more
than the BT-948s)  I don't think the aicxxx support is too terrible, and
I'm willing to live with that until the support for it becomes standard. 

The ultra-scsi IBM drive, I don't quite know what to think of it.  It is
an ultrastar 2ES, and I'm looking for information about its performance.
If anyone has information, please let me know.  The specs of this drive
say that it is supposed to transfer at a minimum sustained rate of 5.1
megs/s, and up to 8 megs/s in certain positions of the drive.  I've
repeatedly tried copying a 47meg wave file, and each time the drive has
taken 34 seconds to finish copying it.  This translates to about 1.4 or
1.5 megs/s, and ofcourse since I'm copying the file to another partition
of the same drive, there's twice as much activity on the scsi-bus, but
even then if the minimum sustained rate is at least 5.1, twice as much
activity on the bus should reduce this rate to about 2.5 megs/s; but I'm
only getting half that.  Ofcourse I don't know if copying a 47 meg file
is a good way to time the read/write speed of a drive; I would welcome
suggestions on how to do that.

The final problem, that I didn't anticipate when I was shopping for
components is the support of the TX chipset.  After I put together the
system, (which by the way turned out to be much easier than I
anticipated; I always thought the hardware installation was easier than
the software installation; it was a snap to put that together, but the
software installation is going to be a bitch.)  I tried installing linux
(redhat 4.1) and it hung over "keyboard timed out" "keyboard timout
error", and I had to reset the system to start the procedure again.  It
also said something like, "unable to read the partition table" and
"unrecognized pci device"; I'm imagining that this refers to the TX
chipset which I imagine isn't yet supported by linux?  I would
appreciate somehelp if anybody would have knowledge of how to bypass
this.  

And of course I thank you guys for your patience for replying comments
and suggestions, despite the fact that my questions and problems had
very little to do with scsi.  My respect and high regard for the linux
community is very much due to the fact that it is supportive, no matter
how silly a question may seem like.

Thanks much pals.
Robert

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post