[841] in linux-net channel archive
Re: Kernel OOPS with 1.2.11
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Woods)
Sat Aug 5 04:17:22 1995
To: Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk
From: Chris Woods <cjwoods@gigotech.net>
Date: 3 Aug 1995 22:01:24 GMT
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <m0sab9s-000xBKC@hq.jcic.org>
On Mon, 24 Jul 1995, Daniel Hollis wrote:
> Here's the latest crash:
[...Stack Trace Deleted...]
> We'll may be trying an SMC Ultra card if we can get our hands on one, and
> see if that makes any difference. Will the SMC prove anything or should we
> try some other card to rule out our hardware and definitively point the
> finger at the Linux networking code? What do we have to do to satisfy the
> kernel developers that it's not our hardware? What card will prove it?
I can speak for the SMC Ultra. We use them under intensive network load,
and have very nice uptimes (>50 days on one machine, >25 on all the
others). We do not use any multiport serial devices however, so I do not
know if some weird interaction is going on between the Boca and the NE2k,
although from the trace you supplied here, it looked very
network-specific.
Never a crash with the SMC Ultra, several with NE2000 clones before we
switched to the SMC.
Sample hardware configurations, more as an FYI: mostly P5-90's (3 of them)
with Adaptec SCSI controllers (2 2842's, a 1542, and a 1522). A couple
486DX2/66's, both with SCSI and IDE. All are running 1.2.10, and most have
32MB RAM, the news server (p5-90 with aha-2842 SCSI) has 64MB.
Chris Woods cjwoods@gigotech.net
GCM/CS/E d--- H++ s+:++ !g p? au-- a- w+ v++ C++ UL++++ P++>++++ L+++ 3+
E++>+++ N+ K++ W--- M-- V-- -po+ Y+ t+ !5 !j R G? tv-- b+ D+ B-
e+ u+ h---- f r+++ n---- y++++
