[486] in linux-net channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: plip progress

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Kraemer)
Wed Jun 14 07:04:13 1995

To: m-ke0082@SPARKY.CS.NYU.EDU (Ken Estes)
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 10:52:40 +0200 (MDT)
From: "Martin Kraemer" <Martin.Kraemer@mch.sni.de>
Cc: linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu (Linux Network Channel)
In-Reply-To: <9506140445.AA28232@SPARKY.CS.NYU.EDU> from "Ken Estes" at Jun 14, 95 00:45:57 am

Ken Estes wrote...
> 
> could I wire together a bunch of plip cables and run several (3-10)
> machines on a cheap network?
> [...], but is it feasible?

Yes, but not in a bus topology like this
        +-----+         +-----+
        |hostA|         |hostC|
        +-----+         +-----+
           I               I
 ...=======+=======+=======+====...
                   I
                +-----+
                |hostB|
                +-----+
Because when no host transmits, then the cable is not "idle" (you'd need a
third  electric  state beside  "on"  and "off",  you  call  that tri-state
drivers; Not available on centronics port). [Instead, the different levels
on the  output lines  of all hosts  would result in  a short  circuit, you
might blow up the parallel interface chips]
But what you can of  course do is this (how much is  a cheap printer card?
how  much  do  you pay  for  a  cheap  arc/ether  card?  is it  worth  the
performance penalty?):
        +-----+         +-----+
        |hostA|         |hostC|
        +-----+         +-----+
          I I             I I
 ...======+ +=====+ +=====+ +===...
                  I I
                +-----+
                |hostB|
                +-----+
that is, give every host _two_  parallel ports, and forward packets  from,
e.g., hostA to  hostC on hostB.  This makes  configuration less simple  of
course, because you have to define all routes manually (is  this right? or
can I have _two_ default routes and hope that either of the two interfaces
will  succeed in reaching  the destination?).  Or use dynamic  routing via
gated (or routed?).

What I would ask myself in your situation is this: if you ever plan to use
more than two hosts, is the added complexity and low performance worth the
price? (2 * $10 for centronics cards, or $30 for ethernet?)

    Martin
-- 
| S I E M E N S |   Martin.Kraemer@mch.sni.de   |       Siemens Nixdorf
| ------------- |   Voice: +49-89-636-46021     |   Informationssysteme AG
| N I X D O R F |   FAX:   +49-89-636-44994     |    81730 Munich, Germany
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  (My opinions only, of course)

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post