[3844] in linux-net channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: route broken in 2.0.7

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alan Cox)
Thu Jul 25 04:30:29 1996

From: Alan Cox <alan@cymru.net>
To: ecki@inka.de (Bernd Eckenfels)
Date: 	Wed, 24 Jul 1996 15:39:21 +0100 (BST)
Cc: submit-linux-dev-net@ratatosk.yggdrasil.com
In-Reply-To: <4t2nlv$p3@nz12.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> from "Bernd Eckenfels" at Jul 23, 96 02:30:23 pm

> Honestly I think those numbers are realy good for nothing. They only help
> you to debug the Caching code, but users would like to see the real usage of
> a route. What do u think? Perhaps both numbers? 

No can do. On a successful cache hit we dont even know what route entry
was used.  People wanting per packet stats should use per packet accounting
thats why its there

Alan


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post