[3789] in linux-net channel archive
Re: Is anyone running INN successfully?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Merillat)
Sat Jul 20 21:55:17 1996
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 22:32:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Dan Merillat <harik@ao.net>
To: Mark Menard <mark@capital.net>
cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, redhat-list@redhat.com,
linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-admin@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.94.960718222212.32345P-100000@www.netgoth.com>
On Thu, 18 Jul 1996, Mark Menard wrote:
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 22:28:51 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Mark Menard <mark@capital.net>
> To: Dan Merillat <harik@ao.net>
> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, redhat-list@redhat.com,
> linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-admin@vger.rutgers.edu
> Subject: Re: Is anyone running INN successfully?
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> On Thu, 18 Jul 1996, Dan Merillat wrote:
> > Speaking of which: how is mmap working with other people? I am testing
> > a secondary server with it and it gets the "file exists symlinking" error
> > which is listed as mmap failure on the active file. 2.0.2 kernel, I
> > havn't had time to compile the "latest and greatest" this week.
>
> I have mmap turned on under 2.0.4 and it has been running flawlessly for 4
> days now. Feed of 18k groups, spool is 9GB running up to about 80% before
> expire. This isn't that long a time, but I think it is an indicator. My
> spool is on a single device if that makes any differenct. (A RAID 0 device
> using md, runs nice.)
Nice. I'm putting about 12 gig togther on a MD0 raid system. Biggest
problem with raid in linux is expansion. :-) Right now it's a matter of
tar, unmount, wipe, add new disk, re-raid, mount, reformat, untar to
expand. Grr. And that only works with 16gig dat tapes.
Anyway i'll upgrade to .4 and see if that works.
--Dan
