[3692] in linux-net channel archive
Re: Is anyone running INN successfully?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Wouters)
Sun Jul 14 20:28:18 1996
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 1996 11:14:24 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@xtdnet.nl>
To: Patrick Main <72254.3077@compuserve.com>
cc: Mark Menard <mark@capital.net>, linux-admin@vger.rutgers.edu,
linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19960712214724.006985e8@wave.beaches.net>
> I later traced down the warning messages when compiling against a 2.0
> source tree and moving the #include <sys/time.h> entries near the "top"
> of where they appear eliminated most warnings. Bottom line is i made sure
> that the first includes were consistantly <sys/types.h> <stdio.h> then
> <sys/time.h> after which other includes followed. Some of the includes
> began with an Inn header file. Every file that included <sys/time.h> was
> changed to the behavior of above. I also did a ifndef on one of the
Ahh now I remember again. There was a problem with compat.h being included
after time.h. in compat.h it does an #ifdef to check weter or not both
time.h and sys/time.h need to be included. Moving around the compat.h
include in 2 or 3 files solved those problems for me. (Just move em as far
up as possible). I did mail this to the INN FAQ maintainer, together with
patch for loadavg calculation. Guess it got lost somewhere :)
> Will try to trace down remaining compile warnings but with a light test feed
> it has been up now for three days. News spool now about 150megs "light"
I don't think I got any warnings. Maybe you have some mistakes in the
config.data file left? But if it stays up for 3 days, i wouldn't worry too
much anymore. The biggest battle is over :)
Paul
--
Due to my recent postings in various Usenet newsgroups, I have been flooded
with unwanted, unsolicited, commercial email. I have taken steps to automate
my, not so polite, retaliation. I am sorry I am forced to do this, but I
am receiving several junk emails a day now. You have been warned.
