[3165] in linux-net channel archive
Re: whats rsize supposed to be now?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Swen Thuemmler)
Mon Jun 10 07:23:18 1996
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 13:11:00 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Swen Thuemmler <swen@uni-paderborn.de>
To: Jon Peatfield <J.S.Peatfield@damtp.cam.ac.uk>
cc: Marty Leisner <leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com>, jp107@damtp.cam.ac.uk,
linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <m0uQvFx-00024iC%kro.amtp.cam.ac.uk@damtp.cam.ac.uk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 4 Jun 1996, Jon Peatfield wrote:
> This reminds me I must check if my mount and amd patches ever made it into the
> standard sources, (I know that the kernel patch is in 1.3.x).
If these are the patches for using unconnected sockets in nfsmount, then a
patch is in mount-2.5j (or 2.5k or so), and I'm trying hard to get the
same patch into amd (I was glad when your patches went into the kernel, I
had tried to get similar patches applied many times but had no success.)
Greetings, Swen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAwUBMbwCzkTyQF8U8wFLAQHHKAP/VVeUZVjMyvcYmDP1iN1PzUFh6UilsVdi
gQLqmeoveTiDZLPYnMDhuHZwHogp8W5W/e/gG+HuptLMhIMBNvGufb9zYCn3599T
Zr5UcsIpmNYcuJxMr6aXMLqzySLgqyt1QLmE2fSiFuc3kdO44oZeHq0clckrD6XR
B+Tnv94YstQ=
=S2vh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
