[2426] in linux-net channel archive
OK, now that we agree
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Shaver)
Tue Apr 9 11:34:08 1996
From: Mike Shaver <shaver@neon.ingenia.com>
To: iialan@iifeak.swan.ac.uk (Alan Cox),
avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed)
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 10:41:11 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu
How much trouble would it be to allow some bizarre and illegal bind()
address (255.255.255.255 springs to mind) register a socket as being a
transparent proxy/user-space masquerade?
It would seem relatively straightforward, but I suspect there are
things here that I'm forgetting about.
Mike
--
#> Mike Shaver (shaver@ingenia.com) Ingenia Communications Corporation <#
#> Technical specialist -- Head geek -- System exorcist <#
#> <#
#> "Have you considered a life? I hear they're quite affordable <#
#> these days." --- shields@tembel.org <#
