[2371] in linux-net channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

another nfs question >>>

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert Anthony Nader)
Fri Apr 5 12:49:35 1996

Date: 	Sat, 06 Apr 1996 04:21:52 +1000
From: Robert Anthony Nader <naderr@topaz.cqu.edu.au>
To: linux-net <linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu>

Hi,

I read ...


|>
|> The subject says it all, NFS is incredibly slow (over ethernet).
|>
|> Every read or write seems to require an ack, it doesn't attempt to write
|> big "packets" (ie generate fragments with 8k writes) - maybe this is causing
|> a significant loss in performance.

:The default rsize/wsize on Linux is 1k, due to those silly cheap Ethernet
:Boards, which are so widespread in the PC market (like those dumb NE1000).
:Those boards are not able to receive 8k Back-to-Bakc packets without loosing
:some of the packets. The NFS performance would go down to zero in this case.

:If you use better boards (with at least 16 k Buffer, or DMA access, or PCI
:boards), then you could add rsize=8192,wsize=8192 to the mount parameters, and
:you will get high performance.


Now, from the nag I get an idea how to do this from the command line ...
but how is this done as entries in /etc/fstab?  The same? just stick 
the rzise ans wsize at the end with the other options?


TIA,


-- 
Cheers,

Rob -


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post