[2061] in linux-net channel archive
Re: Dynamic IPs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve Blake)
Tue Mar 12 23:13:47 1996
To: Dan Merillat <Dan.Merillat@ao.net>
Cc: Linux-Net List <linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 04 Mar 1996 06:58:08 EST."
<Pine.LNX.3.91.960304064120.18839G-100000@eola.ao.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 09:57:24 +22299804
From: "Steve Blake" <slblake@vnet.ibm.com>
> On Sun, 25 Feb 1996, Thomas Pawlikaniec wrote:
>
> > > With IPv6 that would be no problem -- with 128 bit addresses
> > > there are a lot of numbers from which to pull, however it
> > > is not so with this 32 bit IPv4 that we use currently.
> >
> > Could you give me more pointers to info in IPv6 ? When is it supposed to
> > be used, is it already a standard or just some n-th draft, etc... Thanx.
The base IPv6 spec is RFC 1883. There are additional RFCs and drafts
related to addressing architecture, path MTU discovery, neighbor discovery,
address autoconfig, etc. The IPv6 (IPng) working group homepage is at:
http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/ipng-main.html
You can download all of the documents from there. RFC 1883 is now an
IETF Proposed Standard.
/*=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| Steven L. Blake slblake@vnet.ibm.com |
| Internetworking Technology (919)254-2030 |
| IBM Networking Hardware Division |
| "You like the 'Net? You ain't seen nothin' yet!" |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=*/
