[1769] in linux-net channel archive
Re: rlogin yes, telnet no ?!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ed Carp, KHIJOL SysAdmin)
Thu Feb 1 06:54:01 1996
From: "Ed Carp, KHIJOL SysAdmin" <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
To: jmorriso@multiactive.com (John Paul Morrison)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 07:23:21 -0600 (CST)
Cc: jvichere@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca, linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu,
masq@indyramp.com
In-Reply-To: <199601302216.OAA00833@orange.ConcordPacific.Com> from "John Paul Morrison" at Jan 30, 96 02:16:53 pm
Reply-To: ecarp@netcom.com
> It would be a good feature for masquerade to preserve privileged ports (or not - make it configurable).
> rlogin and rlogind use the privileged ports for "security" and stuff like .rhosts. It's not secure
> at all though.
That's why I use SOCKS and ssh. I don't even bother with masquerade -
it's not worth the hassle, and SOCKS is much easier to set up.
--
Ed Carp, N7EKG Ed.Carp@linux.org, ecarp@netcom.com
214/993-3935 voicemail/digital pager
800/558-3408 SkyPager
Finger ecarp@netcom.com for PGP 2.5 public key an88744@anon.penet.fi
"Past the wounds of childhood, past the fallen dreams and the broken families,
through the hurt and the loss and the agony only the night ever hears, is a
waiting soul. Patient, permanent, abundant, it opens its infinite heart and
asks only one thing of you ... 'Remember who it is you really are.'"
-- "Losing Your Mind", Karen Alexander and Rick Boyes
