[9962] in linux-announce channel archive
Super-size tomatoes up to two pounds each
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Official Tomato Giant)
Fri Feb 28 23:12:29 2014
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:12:14 -0800
Reply-To: <bounce-71675797@gctmvedfroom.us>
From: "Official Tomato Giant" <OfficialTomatoGiant@gctmvedfroom.us>
To: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
Envelope-to: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
------=Part.40.2366.1393647134
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Produce up to 180 lbs of super-sized tomatoes
http://www.gctmvedfroom.us/l/lt21SFPLRX4395OQR34TKUIC/40OB209FVEXQ487KYR10DQJ71675797U1541076193
Unsub- http://www.gctmvedfroom.us/l/lc22NSGKYF4395RUO34PVYAE/40JY209GWEAH487UPS10KQO71675797J1541076193
Calling for an end to "old stereotypes," President Obama on Friday portrayed
Mexico as an emerging nation that is remaking itself and said the
U.S.-Mexico relationship should be defined by shared prosperity, not by
threats that both countries face. "It's time to recognize new realities,"
he declared.In a speech to a predominantly student audience, Obama conceded
that the root of much violence in Mexico is the demand for
drugs in the United States, and acknowledged that most guns used to
commit crime in this country come from the U.S. But he said
an improving economy is changing Mexico and improving its middle class."I
see a Mexico that is deepening your democracy," he told several hundred
people gathered on a cool, breezy morning in a covered, outdoor plaza
at Mexico City's grand National Museum of Anthropology. "Citizens who are
standing up and saying that violence and impunity is not acceptable."Obama
said he is optimistic that the U.S. will change its patchwork of
immigration laws and says the current immigration system does not reflect
U.S. values. With about 6 million Mexicans illegally in the United States,
the issue resonates deeply in Mexico, which has also seen deportations of
its citizens from the U.S. rise dramatically under Obama.Underlying Obama's
visit was his desire to convince the American public and U.S. lawmakers
that Mexico no longer poses the illegal immigration threat it once did."The
long-term solution to the chall
ddition to cash-strapped county coffers, especially in the Northwest.
In recent years, the law has acted as a subsidy for states
and counties hard hit by logging declines triggered by measures to protect
threatened species.Idaho's Valley County, for example, would have to return
more than $128,000 from its budget of $2.5 million for roads and
schools. That leaves Gordon Cruickshank, chairman of the Valley County commission,
in a no-win position. Should he forgo the repaving of even a
single mile of the county's 300 miles of paved roads, defer maintenance
on a bridge or lay off two county employees?"We are struggling really
hard now to figure out what to do," Cruickshank said. "It's a
tough pill to swallow that they sent these payments out just a
few months before sequestration, and now they want them back."The Forest
Service has paid billions of dollars to counties over the decades, but
the receipts dwindled as logging on national forests dropped precipitously
in the 1990s -- first in the Northwest to protect the northern
spotted owl and salmon, and then later across the country as concerns
grew over the impact of clear-cut logging on wildlife and clean water.In
2000, Wyden led the charge for a new law, called the Secure
Rural Schools Act, a way for the government to pay counties that
no longer could depend on revenue from logging in federal forests. But
the law has expired, and the last payments went out in January.
Wyden and other l
------=Part.40.2366.1393647134
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.gctmvedfroom.us/l/lt11JLXERS4395QVA34UMHTN/40OH209SFELD487EYU10QSL71675797J1541076193"><H3>Produce up to 180 lbs of super-sized tomatoes</a></H3></strong>
<title>Giant Tomato Tree — Grow Your Own Supersized Tomatoes</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<table width="320" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" id="container">
<tr>
<td style="font:12px/18px Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" id="header">
<p>
<a href="http://www.gctmvedfroom.us/l/lt11HVEUBU4395PHL34ABMYY/40KP209QTRRT487EWC10XQN71675797E1541076193">Giant Tomato Tree — Grow Your Own Supersized Tomatoes</a>
</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<a href="http://www.gctmvedfroom.us/l/lt11INWLPR4395NPB34NACJJ/40PC209FPNVO487YNG10JWM71675797I1541076193"><img src="http://www.gctmvedfroom.us/im/VELFO4395EGMLL34AVXG/40W209K487WM10F71675797V1541076193/img5344043.jpg" alt="Giant Tomato Tree — Grow Your Own Supersized Tomatoes" width="320" border="0" id="body"></a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<a href="http://www.gctmvedfroom.us/l/lc14OBQYUF4395WFJ34UTNKT/40QB209IIGGS487CDM10ECP71675797D1541076193"><img src="http://www.gctmvedfroom.us/im/CFWTH4395MVWCH34NNHC/40J209M487VW10D71675797V1541076193/img6344043.gif" border="0"></a>
<a href="http://www.gctmvedfroom.us/l/lc14XEFCVO4395UAC34PLLCD/40KT209HMQUH487NMP10HTB71675797H1541076193"><img src="http://www.gctmvedfroom.us/im/VUWPY4395KUXSP34MUIS/40M209G487TX10B71675797F1541076193/img7344043.gif" border="0"></a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
<br />
<a href="http://www.gctmvedfroom.us/unsVX4395FU34GJCN/40SEDLQJ209T487REK10RGDNR71675797PR1541076193" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.gctmvedfroom.us/im/MHOFH4395MMSPQ34NXRA/40G209O487XC10Q71675797I1541076193/img8344043.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">ncies' own estimates.Heritage found
the costliest regulations between 2009 and Jan. 20, 2013, came out of
the Environmental Protection Agency, with their rules imposing nearly $40
billion in costs. Next in line was the Department of Transportation, followed
by the Department of Energy.The Department of Health and Human Services
was in the middle of the pack, though with regulations from the
federal health care overhaul still in the pipeline, costs associated with
that agency could rise in the years to come.The costliest rule was
issued by both the EPA and Department of Transportation, imposing new fuel
economy standards on U.S. automobiles. It's estimated to cost $10.8 billion
annually, potentially adding $1,800 to the price of a new car as
manufacturers spend more money to comply.Costing nearly as much was an EPA
rule requiring utilities and other fossil fuel plants to limit emissions
-- though part of that rule is still under review.Though environmental rules
were the costliest, Heritage found that the highest number of regulations
in 2012 were actually in the financial field as a result of
the "Dodd-Frank" financial industry overhaul passed by Congress.The Obama
administration acknowledges that EPA rules are the costliest of any agency.
But the administration claims those rules also come with the biggest benefits
-- benefits that far outweigh the costs.A report put out earlier this
year by the White House Office of Management and Bud
Sept. 4, 2011: Shown here is the main plant facility at the
Navajo Generating Station, as seen from Lake Powell in Page, Ariz.APPresident
Obama, in each of his last three State of the Union addresses,
spoke urgently of the need to cut through the "red tape" in
Washington.But regulatory costs for the American public and business community,
it turns out, soared during his first term. A new report by
the conservative Heritage Foundation estimates that annual regulatory costs
increased during Obama's first four years by nearly $70 billion -- with
more regulations in store for term two."While historical records are incomplete,
that magnitude of regulation is likely unmatched by any administration in
the nation's history," the report said.The analysis by Heritage did not
count every single regulation issued in Obama's first term, but looked at
"major" regulations impacting the private sector. It came up with 131 over
the past four years -- many of them environmental. In addition to
the $70 billion in annual costs from those rules, the report estimated
that new regulations from the first term led to roughly $12 billion
in one-time "implementation costs."The math is up for debate. Even Heritage
acknowledges there is no "official accounting" for federal regulatory costs.
But government agencies, as well as think tanks like Heritage, have tried
to track the price tag by looking at records maintained by the
Government Accountability Office and age
</p>
</html>
------=Part.40.2366.1393647134--
