[9245] in linux-announce channel archive
Motion sensor outdoor LED light
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Original Light Angel)
Fri Jan 3 11:04:59 2014
Reply-To: <bounce-71675797@flanardynese.us>
From: "Original Light Angel" <OriginalLightAngel@flanardynese.us>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 08:05:01 -0800
To: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
------=Part.869.5920.1388765101
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Motion sensor outdoor LED light
http://www.flanardynese.us/3602/174/379/1403/2932.10tt71675797AAF11.php
Unsub- http://www.flanardynese.us/3602/174/379/1403/2932.10tt71675797AAF12.html
detained while trials were pending and
insist that it will withstand court scrutiny. A federal agent convicted
for the first time under the Kansas law could face six months
in prison, though probation would be the presumed sentence."These hard-working
federal employees cannot be forced to choose between the risk of a
criminal prosecution and the continued performance of their federal duties,"
Barry Grissom, the U.S. attorney for Kansas, said in a statement Thursday.But
Kobach called Holder's analysis "simplistic and incorrect" and said the
Kansas law is valid to protect the state's residents against unconstitutional
measures enacted by Congress."We are very, very confident of our position,"
Kobach said in an interview. "The state of Kansas is not in
any way afraid of a legal challenge."The office of Kansas Attorney General
Derek Schmidt has already anticipated a potential legal challenge from the
federal government, and has asked legislators to increase its budget by
$225,000 over the next two years to cover litigation costs.Stoneking said
a dispute could arise after a local gunsmith sells a firearm manufactured
in Kansas to a state resident without complying with federal requirements
for a background check on the buyer or registering the gun. Kobach
agreed."Until that actually happens, there won't be any litigation," Stoneking
said. "The federal government will have to have some way of finding
out."Supporters of the Kansas law have sa
ts offered an amendment that declared climate
change to be caused by humans.The amendment said: "Congress accepts the
scientific findings of the Environmental Protection Agency that climate
changes is occurring, is caused largely by human activities, and poses significant
risks for public health and welfare."That amendment failed, on a 184-240
vote -- which is where the 240 number came from in the
OFA ad.But three of those no votes were Democrats. And not all
of the Republicans who voted against the amendment are on record saying
climate change is a sham. Republicans, rather, complained at the time that
the amendment was not pertinent to the underlying bill.So where does the
word "hoax" come from?There appear to be a couple instances. One, according
to the Post, was from a Democrat, Rep. Henry Waxman, who said
at the time that the Republican bill's premise was "that climate change
is a hoax."The other was a quote from Republican Georgia Rep. Paul
Broun, nestled into the Obama group's video right after the vote factoid.
Broun said: "The idea of human-induced global climate change is one of
the greatest hoaxes perpetrated out of the scientific community. It is a
hoax."But as FactCheck.org pointed out, that quote was from 2009, two years
earlier.FactCheck.org also said that Broun and other Republicans who completely
deny a link to human activity are "off base." But the group
noted there is a diversity of opinion among the GOP caucus on
t
------=Part.869.5920.1388765101
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Light Angel — The Motion Activated Stick Up LED Light</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
</head>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.flanardynese.us/3602/174/379/1403/2932.10tt71675797AAF1.php"><H3>Motion sensor outdoor LED light</a></H3></strong>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<table width="320" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" id="container">
<tr>
<td style="font:12px/18px Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" id="header">
<p>
<a href="http://www.flanardynese.us/3602/174/379/1403/2932.10tt71675797AAF2.php">Light Angel — The Motion Activated Stick Up LED Light</a>
</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<a href="http://www.flanardynese.us/3602/174/379/1403/2932.10tt71675797AAF3.php"><img src="http://www.flanardynese.us/3602/174/379/71675797/1403.2932/img017437943.jpg" alt="Light Angel — The Motion Activated Stick Up LED Light" width="320" height="533" border="0" id="body"></a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<a href="http://www.flanardynese.us/3602/174/379/1403/2932.10tt71675797AAF4.html"><img src="http://www.flanardynese.us/3602/174/379/71675797/1403.2932/img117437943.gif" border="0"></a>
<a href="http://www.flanardynese.us/3602/174/379/1403/2932.10tt71675797AAF5.html"><img src="http://www.flanardynese.us/3602/174/379/71675797/1403.2932/img217437943.gif" border="0"></a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
<br />
<a href="http://www.flanardynese.us/u/3602/1403/2932/10/71675797/linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.flanardynese.us/3602/174/379/71675797/1403.2932/img317437943.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">ncy demanding
money back that they have already spent," said NGA Deputy Director Barry
Anderson.In a letter sent to senior Obama administration officials in late
March, four House Democrats joined 27 House Republicans in assailing the
Forest Service's demand, calling it an "obvious attempt by President Obama's
administration to make the sequester cuts as painful as possible." The Forest
Service was aware for months that sequestration was a possibility, they
said. Yet even after it went into effect, the agency waited for
several weeks before informing states that payments would have to be returned."We
request that this action be halted," the House members wrote.
B-52 bombers, for the first time. The
paper reports U.S. officials have demonstrated an earlier version of the
bomb's capabilities to Israeli leaders several times recently by showing
them a video of the bomb hitting its target in high-altitude testing.Pentagon
officials view the development of the weapon as critical to convincing Israelit
can rely on the U.S. to stop Iran from developing nukes, and
that the Israeli military cannot do so on its own.According to the
Wall Street Journal, the new version of the MOP has advanced components
that would allow it to evade Iranian defense systems to reach the
Fordow nuclear complex, which is by numerous accounts buried under a mountain
in Iran. This upgraded version has not yet been dropped from a
plane."It gives us a far greater capability to reach and destroy an
enemy's weapons of mass destruction that are located in well protected underground
facilities... to a magnitude far greater than we have now," Pentagon Spokesman
Capt. John Kirby said.Kirby denied the bombs are designed to target Iran,
even though it is the only country known to have buried its
nuclear weapons program."The system is not aimed at any one country, it's
to develop a capability we believe we need," Kirby said. That remark
was met by audible groans and various comments of disbelief from the
Pentagon press corps.Boeing successfully tested the bomb on March 17, 2007
at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico.Pentagon Spokesma
</p>
</html>
------=Part.869.5920.1388765101--
