[8395] in linux-announce channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

linuxch-announce.discuss, can this 10 Second Trick Help Prevent YOUR Heart Attack?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Heart Attack Fighter)
Thu Oct 24 12:04:44 2013

From: "Heart Attack Fighter" <HeartAttackFighter@ihlatecqn.us>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:04:43 -0700
To: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu

------=Part.886.9425.1382630683
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Can this 10 Second Trick Help Prevent YOUR Heart Attack?

http://www.ihlatecqn.us/2690/127/265/1099/2351.10tt71675797AAF19.php







Unsub- http://www.ihlatecqn.us/2690/127/265/1099/2351.10tt71675797AAF20.html













isis in Syria."President Obama has said 
the use of chemical weapons would be a "game-changer" in the U.S. 
position on intervening in the two-year-old Syrian civil war. Obama said 
last August that "a red line for us" would be the movement 
or use of chemical weapons, adding "that would change my calculus."Sen. 
Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., reacting to the reports Thursday, said the "number 
one" goal should be to "secure the chemical weapons before they fall 
into the wrong hands.""I think the red line's been crossed and the 
question is, now what?" Graham said on Fox News.Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., 
also said in a statement the assessment is "deeply troubling and, if 
correct, means that President Obama's red line has certainly been crossed."But 
Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., argued that it is not in the United 
States' "best interest" to go into Syria. "We cannot be absolutely sure 
about the extent to which Assad's forces have used chemical weapons, although 
we know they have them," he said in a statement.Caitlin Hayden, a 
spokeswoman for the White House National Security Council, said more information 
is needed."Precisely because the president takes this issue so seriously, 
we have an obligation to fully investigate any and all evidence of 
chemical weapons use within Syria," she said in a statement. "That is 
why we are currently pressing for a comprehensive United Nations investigation 
that can credibly evaluate the evidence and establish what took plac
Frustrated at being left out of an immigration overhaul, gay rights groups 
are pushing to adjust a bipartisan Senate bill to include gay couples. 
But Democrats are treading carefully, wary of adding another divisive issue 
that could lose Republican support and jeopardize the entire bill.Both parties 
want the bill to succeed. Merely getting to agreement on the basic 
framework for the immigration overhaul, which would create a long and costly 
path to citizenship for the estimated 11 million people in the U.S. 
illegally, was no small feat for senators. And getting it through a 
divided Congress is still far from a done deal.Even so, gay rights 
groups, their lobbyists and grass-roots supporters are insisting the deal 
shouldn't exclude bi-national, same-sex couples -- about 28,500 of them, 
according to a 2011 study from the Williams Institute at UCLA Law. 
They're ramping up a campaign to change the bill to allow gay 
Americans to sponsor their partners for green cards, the same way straight 
Americans can. Supporters trekked to the Capitol to make their case at 
senators' offices on Wednesday."Opponents will be proposing amendments that, 
if passed, could collapse this very fragile coalition that we've been able 
to achieve," Sen. John McCain, an Arizona Republican, said last week at 
the unveiling of the bill. He said the eight senators from both 
parties who crafted the legislation are committed to voting against changes 
that could kill it.For Dem


------=Part.886.9425.1382630683
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
<title>Untitled Document</title>
<style type="text/css">
red {
	color: #F00;
}
black {
	color: #000;
}
</style>
</head>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.ihlatecqn.us/2690/127/265/1099/2351.10tt71675797AAF11.php"><H3>Can this 10 Second Trick Help Prevent YOUR Heart Attack?</a></H3></strong>
<body>
<table width="535" border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" style="width: 535px; height: 200px;">
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td width="531" height="706" align="left"><p><strong><br />
        <span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;">Can this 10 Second Trick Help Prevent YOUR Heart Attack?</span></strong><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><br />
          <br />
          Bottom Line: 1 in 3 people die from Heart Disease.... so, unfortunately, there is a very good chance YOU will die of a heart attack. <br />
          <br />
          Luckily, there is a 10 Second Trick that can help prevent heart attacks.<br />
          <br />
          When you watch this FREE presentation, you will discover the 10 Second Trick for preventing heart attacks - which, by-the-way, the Big Drug Companies would rather you didn't see.<br />
          <br />
          <a href="http://www.ihlatecqn.us/2690/127/265/1099/2351.10tt71675797AAF11.php">CLICK BELOW TO WATCH THE VIDEO</a></span>        </p>
        <p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><a href="http://www.ihlatecqn.us/2690/127/265/1099/2351.10tt71675797AAF11.php"><img src="http://www.ihlatecqn.us/2690/127/265/71675797/1099.2351/img012726543.jpg" width="387" height="289" border="0" /></a><br />
          <br />
          <span class="red">WARNING: <span class="black">The following presentation contains controversial material, and a graphic representation of what it feels like to suffer a heart attack. While there is no profanity of any kind, viewer discretion is advised.</span></span><br />
        </span><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><br />
          <br />
          <br />
          <br />
        </span></p></td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 10px">To update subscription please <a href="http://www.ihlatecqn.us/2690/127/265/1099/2351.10tt71675797AAF14.html">visit here</a> or write:<br />
OmegaK,  Inc
  19239  N. Dale Mabry Hwy #148
  Lutz,  FL 33548
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
<br />
 <a href="http://www.ihlatecqn.us/u/2690/1099/2351/10/71675797/linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.ihlatecqn.us/2690/127/265/71675797/1099.2351/img212726543.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> 
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">-year 
Treasury note, which has fallen in recent weeks.The Federal Reserve has 
been buying Treasury bonds since the fall. That has helped to lower 
the yield. And in recent weeks, concerns that the U.S. and global 
economies are slowing have led investors to shift money into safer assets, 
like Treasurys, and away from stocks. Greater demand for Treasurys raises 
their price and lowers their yield.The yield was 1.72 percent at midday 
Thursday, up from 1.69 percent last week but still at a historically 
low level.To calculate average mortgage rates, Freddie Mac surveys lenders 
across the country on Monday through Wednesday each week. The average doesn't 
include extra fees, known as points, which most borrowers must pay to 
get the lowest rates. One point equals 1 percent of the loan 
amount.The average fee for 30-year mortgages rose to 0.8 point from 0.7 
point last week. The fee for 15-year loans was unchanged at 0.7 
point.The average rate on a one-year adjustable-rate mortgage fell to 2.58 
percent from 2.63 percent last week. The fee for one-year adjustable-rate 
loans increased to 0.5 point from 0.4.The average rate on a five-year 
adjustable-rate mortgage rose to 2.62 percent from 2.60 percent. The fee 
declined to 0.3 point from 0.5.
 assaulted    because 
they were perceived as gay. About 13 percent of lesbians said the 
same.A separate study of young people in England also found that, in 
their teens, gay boys and lesbians were almost twice as likely to 
be bullied as their straight peers. By young adulthood, it was about 
the same for lesbians and straight girls. But in this study, published 
recently in the journal Pediatrics, gay young men were almost four times 
more likely than their straight peers to be bullied.At least one historian 
says it wasn't always that way for either men or women, whose 
"expressions of love" with friends of the same gender were seen as 
a norm    even idealized    in the 
19th century."These relationships offered ample opportunity for those who 
would have wanted to act on it physically, even if most did 
not," says Thomas Foster, associate professor and head of the history department 
at DePaul University in Chicago.Today's "code of male gendered behavior," 
he says, often rejects these kinds of expressions between men.We joke about 
the "bro-mance"    a term used to describe close friendships 
between straight men. But in some sense, the humor stems from the 
insinuation that those relationships could be romantic, though everyone 
assumes they aren't.Call those friends "gay," a word that's still commonly 
used as an insult, and that's quite another thing. Consider the furor 
over Rutgers University men's basketball coach Mike Rice, who was recently 

</p>
</html>

------=Part.886.9425.1382630683--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post