[8368] in linux-announce channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Last mop you'll ever use

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hurricane Mop Sale)
Tue Oct 22 20:04:19 2013

To: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
From: "Hurricane Mop Sale" <HurricaneMopSale@marenagulashlema.us>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:04:20 -0700

------=Part.148.3595.1382486660
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Do you know what bacteria and germs are on your old mop?

http://www.marenagulashlema.us/2658/153/335/1278/2685.10tt71675797AAF11.php





Unsub- http://www.marenagulashlema.us/2658/153/335/1278/2685.10tt71675797AAF12.html












 received a notice that the space telescope and 
Cosmos 1805 would miss each other by just 700 feet. The mission 
team monitored the situation over the next day and it became clear 
that the two spacecraft, traveling in different orbits, would zip through 
the same point in space within 30 milliseconds of one another, NASA 
officials said."My immediate reaction was, 'Whoa, this is different from 
anything we've seen before!'" NASA's Fermi project scientist Julie McEnery 
said in a statement.The Russian space junk was travelling at a speed 
of 27,000 miles per hour in relation to Fermi. If it had 
smashed into the space telescope the explosion of the two spacecraft would 
have released "as much energy as two and a half tons of 
explosives," NASA officials said"It was clear we had to be ready to 
move Fermi out of the way, and that's when I alerted our 
Flight Dynamics Team that we were planning a maneuver," McEnery added.After 
making those calculations, scientists started planning to fire Fermi's thrusters 
specifically designed to move the satellite out of the way if these 
situations arise."It's similar to forecasting rain at a specific time and 
place a week in advance," Eric Stoneking, the attitude control lead engineer 
for Fermi at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center said of predicting these 
kinds of impacts in a statement. "As the date approaches, uncertainties 
in the prediction decrease and the initial picture may change dramatically."The 
two sp
 The passenger in the rear 
seat, James Coston, then fired multiple shots before he was killed by 
trooper James Harper. As Harper sought cover, Chesimard stepped out of the 
car and continuously fired at both him and Foerster, who was engaged 
in hand-to-hand combat with Clark Squire, the driver.Foerster was shot in 
the abdomen and right arm. According to police accounts, Chesimard picked 
up Foerster's gun and put two bullets in his head, execution-style, as 
he lay along the side of the turnpike. Authorities say her jammed 
handgun was found next to Foerster's body.Chesimard, Coston and Squire fled 
and abandoned their car 5 miles down the road. It didn't take 
long for police to locate the car and Coston, who was found 
dead near the vehicle. A half-hour after the shooting, state police arrested 
Chesimard. Squire was arrested a mile from the car about 40 hours 
after the incident.Chesimard denied that she shot at anyone and claimed 
that the militant and cop-killer labels made her a target. But four 
years later, she was convicted of first-degree murder, assault and battery 
of a police officer, assault with a dangerous weapon, assault with intent 
to kill, illegal possession of a weapon and armed robbery.On Nov. 2, 
1979, Chesimard escaped from prison in New Jersey. Police believe a group 
of black and white domestic terrorists approached Chesimard while at a maximum 
security prison in West Virginia, but waited until she was transferred to 
a mini

------=Part.148.3595.1382486660
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Hurricane Mop &mdash; Dual Washer and Dryer Mop System Cleans, Dries, & Polishes in One Simple Step</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
</head>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.marenagulashlema.us/2658/153/335/1278/2685.10tt71675797AAF1.php"><H3>Do you know what bacteria and germs are on your old mop?</a></H3></strong>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<table width="320" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" id="container">
	<tr>
		<td style="font:12px/18px Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" id="header">
			<p>
				<a href="http://www.marenagulashlema.us/2658/153/335/1278/2685.10tt71675797AAF2.php">Hurricane Mop &mdash; Dual Washer and Dryer Mop System Cleans, Dries, & Polishes in One Simple Step</a>
			</p>
		</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td align="center">
        	<a href="http://www.marenagulashlema.us/2658/153/335/1278/2685.10tt71675797AAF3.php"><img src="http://www.marenagulashlema.us/2658/153/335/71675797/1278.2685/img015333543.jpg" alt="Hurricane Mop &mdash; Dual Washer and Dryer Mop System Cleans, Dries, & Polishes in One Simple Step" width="320" height="512" border="0" id="body"></a>
        </td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td align="center">
			<a href="http://www.marenagulashlema.us/2658/153/335/1278/2685.10tt71675797AAF4.html"><img src="http://www.marenagulashlema.us/2658/153/335/71675797/1278.2685/img115333543.gif" border="0"></a>
        	<a href="http://www.marenagulashlema.us/2658/153/335/1278/2685.10tt71675797AAF5.html"><img src="http://www.marenagulashlema.us/2658/153/335/71675797/1278.2685/img215333543.gif" border="0"></a>
		</td>
	</tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
<br />
 <a href="http://www.marenagulashlema.us/u/2658/1278/2685/10/71675797/linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.marenagulashlema.us/2658/153/335/71675797/1278.2685/img315333543.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> 
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;"> was out 
of the country.That meant the authority then reverted directly to the U.S. 
State Department, and oversight of the response to the attack that night 
fell to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Undersecretary of State 
Patrick Kennedy, who were calling the shots.Sources said that shortly after 
the attack began around 9:40 p.m., special forces put out the calls 
for assets to be moved into position."What that does is that enacts 
.. every asset, every element to respond and it becomes a global 
priority," one source said. "I would tell you that was given and 
the only reason it was given is because of special operations pack."However, 
the source said, "Assets did not move."The failure of the State Department 
or White House to give the military permission to go into Libya, 
according to the source, only accentuates the significant breakdown in communication 
among the State Department, military, CIA and White House."I can see the 
initial confusion in the beginning. I mean, you have a situation that's 
developing. The problem with the State Department is they don't have procedures 
in place. And if they do, they haven't practiced or exercised them. 
And now they are making up for all the mistakes they have 
made, with excuse. And there is no excuse," the source said, describing 
a "huge breakdown between State and military."Last October, then-Defense 
Secretary Leon Panetta defended the response, saying the military was reluctant 
to p
  sanctions 
in response to a nuclear test explosion in February, the North's third.38 
North says if North Korea has produced enough low-enriched uranium to run 
the new reactor, it could commence the lengthy process of starting it 
up in the coming weeks, and be fully operational during the first 
half of 2014."Pyongyang is probably planning to build additional power reactors 
to end its electricity shortage and help solve its economic problems. It 
may have some residual ability to produce plutonium for nuclear weapons, 
but the biggest concern about these reactors is whether they are safe 
or not," said Joel Wit, a former State Department official and editor 
of 38 North.North Korea lacks experience in designing and running light-water 
reactors and there's no international oversight of its nuclear program. 
Containing the nuclear fuel and keeping the reactor cool pose major challenges 
-- as would unforeseen events like natural disasters that caused a meltdown 
in Japan's Fukushima reactor in 2011, the analysis says.Aerial images indicate 
the North has made rapid headway in the past year on constructing 
the reactor, although installation of its water and electrical connections 
is incomplete. And there are signs that equipment was moved inside the 
reactor during the fall. That's where the bulk of the work is 
now likely being done -- beyond satellite eye's view.North Korea revealed 
an industrial-scale uranium enrichment facility in 2010 to provide 
</p>
</html>

------=Part.148.3595.1382486660--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post