[8313] in linux-announce channel archive
Are You Online? - See Pics of Singles Now!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Match.com Partner)
Fri Oct 18 21:05:31 2013
To: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
From: "Match.com Partner" <Match.comPartner@walp2marisa.us>
Reply-To: <bounce-71675797@walp2marisa.us>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 18:05:28 -0700
------=Part.919.8683.1382144728
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Dating News: 1 in 5 Relationships Start Online - Meet Singles Today!
http://www.walp2marisa.us/2596/107/216/997/1991.10tt71675797AAF18.php
Unsub- http://www.walp2marisa.us/2596/107/216/997/1991.10tt71675797AAF8.html
aid, crying.
"We hope for a miracle that he will be ok."Johana Portillo wasn't
at the Saturday afternoon game in the Salt Lake City suburb of
Taylorsville, but she said she's been told by witnesses and detectives that
the player hit her father in the side of the head after
he issued the yellow card."When he was writing down his notes, he
just came out of nowhere and punched him," she said.His friends who
were there told her Ricardo Portillo seemed fine at first, but then
asked to be held because he felt dizzy. They sat him down
and he started vomiting blood, triggering his friend to call an ambulance.
The referee has been in a coma since Saturday.Johana Portillo said her
father's passion is soccer, and he's been a referee in the recreational
league for eight years. Five years ago, a player upset with a
call broke his ribs. A few years before that, a player broke
his leg, she said. Other referees have been hurt, too.His daughters begged
him to stop refereeing -- his second job -- but he continued
because he loved soccer."It was his passion," she said. "We could not
tell him no."The league is not affiliated with the Utah Youth Soccer
Association or any city or town recreation department. It is called the
Liga Continental, said the referee's brother-in-law Pedro Lopez, who also
gets paid to referee in the league.Johana Portillo said the family doesn't
know the teenager who threw the punch, and they haven't heard from
him or anyone in h
ncies' own estimates.Heritage found
the costliest regulations between 2009 and Jan. 20, 2013, came out of
the Environmental Protection Agency, with their rules imposing nearly $40
billion in costs. Next in line was the Department of Transportation, followed
by the Department of Energy.The Department of Health and Human Services
was in the middle of the pack, though with regulations from the
federal health care overhaul still in the pipeline, costs associated with
that agency could rise in the years to come.The costliest rule was
issued by both the EPA and Department of Transportation, imposing new fuel
economy standards on U.S. automobiles. It's estimated to cost $10.8 billion
annually, potentially adding $1,800 to the price of a new car as
manufacturers spend more money to comply.Costing nearly as much was an EPA
rule requiring utilities and other fossil fuel plants to limit emissions
-- though part of that rule is still under review.Though environmental rules
were the costliest, Heritage found that the highest number of regulations
in 2012 were actually in the financial field as a result of
the "Dodd-Frank" financial industry overhaul passed by Congress.The Obama
administration acknowledges that EPA rules are the costliest of any agency.
But the administration claims those rules also come with the biggest benefits
-- benefits that far outweigh the costs.A report put out earlier this
year by the White House Office of Management and Bud
------=Part.919.8683.1382144728
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<html>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.walp2marisa.us/2596/107/216/997/1991.10tt71675797AAF14.php"><H3>Dating News: 1 in 5 Relationships Start Online - Meet Singles Today!</a></H3></strong>
<td colspan='2' align='center' valign='middle' class='preview-mid'><br><center><a href="http://www.walp2marisa.us/2596/107/216/997/1991.10tt71675797AAF14.php"><img src="http://www.walp2marisa.us/2596/107/216/71675797/997.1991/img010721643.jpg" border=0 alt=""></a></center> <div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="1"><br><a href="http://www.walp2marisa.us/2596/107/216/997/1991.10tt71675797AAF3.html"><font color="#666666">Update Preferences</font></a><br><br> Match.com | P.O. Box 25472 | Dallas, TX 75225 </font></td></td></tr></table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
<br />
<a href="http://www.walp2marisa.us/u/2596/997/1991/10/71675797/linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.walp2marisa.us/2596/107/216/71675797/997.1991/img210721643.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> </br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">cate people and it is a way that people can learn
about different peoples lifestyles and different peoples jobs. Not every
show does that. Here Comes Honey Boo Boo, some can argue that
its just kind of garbage for your mind but entertaining Reality TV
is really serving a lot of purposes these days said Cascerceri.Meyer was
less optimistic about the genre. He said he was unsure how long
reality shows would stick around.I think that reality TV is kind of
people stumbling around in the dark and sometimes they find something that
blasts off, no one really knows why but because its a very
fast moving business Maybe the next big hit is already here.Diana Falzone
is a FoxNews.com contributor and the advice columnist for My Wingman Diana
on Military.com. Her work has been published in the textbook "Sexuality
Education," distributed in universities across North America.You can follow
her on Twitter @dianafalzone.
Shown here is an iceberg off Ammassalik Island in Eastern Greenland.APA
recent video from a President Obama-aligned group is under fire from fact-checkers
for claiming hundreds of House members voted to call climate change a
"hoax" -- namely, because they didn't.The video from Organizing for Action
cleverly splices together quotes from Republican climate change skeptics
while building up to the factoid about the vote, which was on
an amendment to a broader bill in 2011.The video then includes the
following text: "Number of House members who voted in 2011 that climate
change was a 'hoax': 240."The amendment, though, did not include the word
hoax, and the circumstances of the vote were far more complicated than
the video portrayed. FactCheck.org and The Washington Post have both called
out the claim as inaccurate, with the Post giving it four "Pinocchios,"
which is the worst score for the truthfulness the paper gives out."In
this case, the Obama group has twisted the meaning of a relatively
minor amendment -- which was clearly intended to become fodder for future
campaign ads," the Post wrote.The amendment in question was introduced by
Democrats, in the course of debate over a Republican bill that dealt
with regulation, not the science of climate change itself. The Republican
bill was aimed at barring the EPA from regulating carbon dioxide and
other gases and giving that power to Congress.But, in an effort to
pressure Republicans, Democra
</p>
</html>
------=Part.919.8683.1382144728--
