[47461] in linux-announce channel archive
Top scientist: New way any man can shrink his prostate
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hormone Hacker)
Mon Jan 20 07:39:23 2025
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:38:46 +0100
From: "Hormone Hacker" <HormoneHacker@strongbrain.ru.com>
Reply-To: "Healthcare" <EmptyBladder@strongbrain.ru.com>
To: <linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu>
--afa1f2675209ce14c3d7e2d6981e80d1_2c3b5_13ed1
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Top scientist: New way any man can shrink his prostate
http://strongbrain.ru.com/Kc8a19I-wq24erzXRJqg-0iKtwtMjdJ3dDMFf-74k9-cMz-N
http://strongbrain.ru.com/0KcK0CnxHsCuiyOtssp3giXYmWWMhxqa47ce58AvCukcX__qfQ
vices Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 (Aon v ANU) is a decision by the High Court of Australia (High Court). After a bushfire destroyed property and equipment at the Australian National University's (ANU) Mount Stromlo campus near Canberra, the university lodged an insurance claim. After its insurers disputed the claim on various grounds, ANU commenced legal proceedings against them, later adding its insurance broker, Aon, to the proceedings, arguing it had been negligent in placing the insurance policies. After settling with the insurers, ANU was granted the right to amend their case against Aon. Aon challenged the decision to allow this amendment in the High Court.
The High Court confirmed that the right for a party in a court case would not be granted sheerly because an amendment raises an arguable issue, but only according to the principles of effectively managing legal cases to justly resolve the issues between the parties. Aon v ANU reversed the previous decision of Queensland v JL Holdings which had held the most important consideration when assessing such a request was the consideration of justice, and that any inconvenience to the other party was curable by awarding costs against the am
--afa1f2675209ce14c3d7e2d6981e80d1_2c3b5_13ed1
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<title>Newsletter</title>
</head>
<body><a href="http://strongbrain.ru.com/tyBYCxGdR_3qknfrjDWZdgXDgc-sQVMjZ1oUFbZ7V5xQIwMT7A"><img src="http://strongbrain.ru.com/2c41e08b5dd254e34c.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.strongbrain.ru.com/qprjlKg2LOskV53aYKqblmcXnQOGQ5_Hs4YZVTfuRPo4wxqCJQ" width="1" /></a>
<center>
<div style="font-size: 18px; width: 600px; text-align: left;padding:10px;font-family:Arial;"><strong>Drink less fluids to pee less, right? Nope.</strong><br />
<br />
According to this award-winning professor, drinking less fluids actually makes your prostate and bladder issues worse.<br />
<br />
So how can you fully empty your bladder every time you pee?<br />
<br />
<a href="http://strongbrain.ru.com/Kc8a19I-wq24erzXRJqg-0iKtwtMjdJ3dDMFf-74k9-cMz-N" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" style="font-weight:bold" target="blank">>> With this 5-second "bladder-releasing" ritual</a><br />
<br />
If you're sick and tired of nighttime bathroom trips, weak urine flows, and the inability to empty your bladder...<br />
<br />
Then watch this video to see this urologist-approved "5-sec ritual" while it's still online.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://strongbrain.ru.com/Kc8a19I-wq24erzXRJqg-0iKtwtMjdJ3dDMFf-74k9-cMz-N" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" style="font-weight:bold" target="blank">Tap here to discover how to turn your weak stream into a fire hose...</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://strongbrain.ru.com/jzKEDIImHxRyI007izHaFnedv3ose3nKYg9OfwvzpsGgtS8Sdw" http:="" microsoft.com="" target="blank"><img alt=" " http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://strongbrain.ru.com/239db7506ac7967525.jpg" /></a></center>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:8px;visibility:hidden;">vices Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 (Aon v ANU) is a decision by the High Court of Australia (High Court). After a bushfire destroyed property and equipment at the Australian National University's (ANU) Mount Stromlo campus near Canberra, the university lodged an insurance claim. After its insurers disputed the claim on various grounds, ANU commenced legal proceedings against them, later adding its insurance broker, Aon, to the proceedings, arguing it had been negligent in placing the insurance policies. After settling with the insurers, ANU was granted the right to amend their case against Aon. Aon challenged the decision to allow this amendment in the High Court. The High Court confirmed that the right for a party in a court case would not be granted sheerly because an amendment raises an arguable issue, but only according to the principles of effectively managing legal cases to justly resolve the issues between the parties. Aon v ANU reversed the previous decision of Queensland v JL Holdings which had held the most important consideration when assessing such a request was the consideration of justice, and that any inconvenience to the other party was curable by awarding costs against the am</div>
<br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://strongbrain.ru.com/0KcK0CnxHsCuiyOtssp3giXYmWWMhxqa47ce58AvCukcX__qfQ" http:="" microsoft.com="" target="blank"><img alt=" " http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://strongbrain.ru.com/4d4cc985ccd2dbf09d.png" /></a></center>
<br />
<br />
</div>
</center>
</body>
</html>
--afa1f2675209ce14c3d7e2d6981e80d1_2c3b5_13ed1--
