[45001] in linux-announce channel archive
Harvard: Why Barefoot Kenyans Have 3X Better Balance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Die in 10 Years?)
Sat Mar 2 23:02:18 2024
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2024 04:37:18 +0100
From: "Die in 10 Years?" <Diein10Years?@patriotpowergeneratorx.best>
Reply-To: "Die in 10 Years?" <Diein10Years?@patriotpowergeneratorx.best>
To: <linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu>
--d477ec8977054ddaa4456e8ca7790fc1_2260a_c97ba
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Harvard: Why Barefoot Kenyans Have 3X Better Balance
http://patriotpowergeneratorx.best/1jNUvV5W-5U1-ojMI9X7t52KeEaNyixZjMxKMx2yGxNr4Vgwew
http://patriotpowergeneratorx.best/fxJevFODrd0H4Pthme0bZRrlJD2cEtVeZJNf13EK8_TVBVl2BA
Fodor and his language of thought hypothesis. According to his argument, spoken and written language derive their intentionality and meaning from an internal language encoded in the mind. The main argument in favor of such a view is that the structure of thoughts and the structure of language seem to share a compositional, systematic character. Another argument is that it is difficult to explain how signs and symbols on paper can represent anything meaningful unless some sort of meaning is infused into them by the contents of the mind. One of the main arguments against is that such levels of language can lead to an infinite regress. In any case, many philosophers of mind and language, such as Ruth Millikan, Fred Dretske and Fodor, have recently turned their attention to explaining the meanings of mental contents and states directly.
Another tradition of philosophers has attempted to show that language and thought are coextensive – that there is no way of explaining one without the other. Donald Davidson, in his essay "Thought and Talk", argued that the notion of belief could only arise as a product of public linguistic interaction. Daniel Dennett holds a similar interpretationist view of propositional attitudes. To an extent, the theoretical underpinnings to cognitive semantics (including the notion of semantic framing) suggest the influence of language upon thought. However, the same tradition views meaning and grammar as a function of conceptualization, making it difficult to assess in any straightforward wa
--d477ec8977054ddaa4456e8ca7790fc1_2260a_c97ba
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<title>Newsletter</title>
</head>
<body><a href="http://patriotpowergeneratorx.best/vZqfPGA2qpeZ1WG7BDIuLKBb6BzyYwabf0wQsJ6m9v4tMaGV3A"><img src="http://patriotpowergeneratorx.best/0d217b19cfe132c4db.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.patriotpowergeneratorx.best/mvJRAhAYBUcj1dp7HeRwWVX-LdsbSFR5jAqkucgeFNrP45RdHA" width="1" /></a><br />
<center>
<div style="width:500px;">
<div style="font-family:cambria;width:500px;font-size:18px;padding:8px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #000000;">Adults who failed a balance test were <b>TWICE as likely to die in the next 10 years.</b><br />
<br />
According to the British Journal of Sports Medicine…<br />
<br />
Poor balance won’t just cause a scary fall…<br />
<br />
Forcing your loved ones to push you around on a wheelchair and spoon feed you.<br />
<br />
Losing your balance could also end your life.<br />
<br />
<b>Fortunately, there’s a simple 10-sec balance movement that improves your balance by 92%.</b><br />
<br />
Over 112,928 adults have erased their fear of falling and regained their independence thanks to this simple movement. Try it for yourself:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://patriotpowergeneratorx.best/1jNUvV5W-5U1-ojMI9X7t52KeEaNyixZjMxKMx2yGxNr4Vgwew" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" style="font-weight:bold;" target="blank">>> Click here to try this 10-second balance movement</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://patriotpowergeneratorx.best/1jNUvV5W-5U1-ojMI9X7t52KeEaNyixZjMxKMx2yGxNr4Vgwew" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" style="font-weight:bold;" target="blank"><img src="http://patriotpowergeneratorx.best/6745f4484ff8a23e87.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:5px;">Fodor and his language of thought hypothesis. According to his argument, spoken and written language derive their intentionality and meaning from an internal language encoded in the mind. The main argument in favor of such a view is that the structure of thoughts and the structure of language seem to share a compositional, systematic character. Another argument is that it is difficult to explain how signs and symbols on paper can represent anything meaningful unless some sort of meaning is infused into them by the contents of the mind. One of the main arguments against is that such levels of language can lead to an infinite regress. In any case, many philosophers of mind and language, such as Ruth Millikan, Fred Dretske and Fodor, have recently turned their attention to explaining the meanings of mental contents and states directly. Another tradition of philosophers has attempted to show that language and thought are coextensive – that there is no way of explaining one without the other. Donald Davidson, in his essay "Thought and Talk", argued that the notion of belief could only arise as a product of public linguistic interaction. Daniel Dennett holds a similar interpretationist view of propositional attitudes. To an extent, the theoretical underpinnings to cognitive semantics (including the notion of semantic framing) suggest the influence of language upon thought. However, the same tradition views meaning and grammar as a function of conceptualization, making it difficult to assess in any straightforward wa</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://patriotpowergeneratorx.best/Ty6_uAStqY_Jqycp31zX_z5vLuOeRT03qflBr3xvQIrbKbH0Hw" http:="" microsoft.com="" target="blank"><img src="http://patriotpowergeneratorx.best/321d4968ed7a38850c.png" /></a> <br />
<br />
</div>
</center>
</body>
</html>
--d477ec8977054ddaa4456e8ca7790fc1_2260a_c97ba--
