[44455] in linux-announce channel archive
AB1-4 Warnings Signs Of Dementia (#2 Is Scary)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cognilux Affiliate)
Thu Dec 14 11:04:31 2023
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 17:02:31 +0100
From: "Cognilux Affiliate" <CogniluxAffiliate@dreamzyhumidifier.best>
Reply-To: "Cognilux Partner" <CogniluxAffiliate@dreamzyhumidifier.best>
To: <linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu>
--e6acc2abf54bee64e660c4bd271da544_1f401_71694
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
AB1-4 Warnings Signs Of Dementia (#2 Is Scary)
http://dreamzyhumidifier.best/kzFIM_VstH8WpNpH0ZwHYkufaHVpLUs2OfKYJ0VdY4WFDEN1iw
http://dreamzyhumidifier.best/4RsTXg-vpR6rHBd1bYgO0C6RPPtwKMm3P4lK5-HdctAEdJR9gg
the walls and columns of the temple's cella, surrounding a core of concrete (known to the Romans as opus caementicium). According to reconstructions made by the archaeologist Giuseppe Lugli, the temple had overall dimensions of 22.4 by 38.8 metres (73 by 127 ft), with a cella 26 metres (85 ft) long and a pronaos 12.8 metres (42 ft) in length.
The surviving ruins do not allow a definitive reconstruction of the temple's orientation. It is generally believed to have faced south: the temple's first excavator, Pietro Rosa, proposed this orientation in 1865, on the grounds that it would have the temple face out of the hillside in a similar manner to earlier Republican hillside sanctuaries found elsewhere in Latium. In 1913, the prehistorian Giovanni Pinza suggested that the temple may have faced north, which he considered a better fit with the surviving accounts of its appearance in Roman literature, but his idea was generally rejected. Some modern hypotheses, such as that of Claridge, have argued for a north-facing temple on the grounds that the more substantial foundations of the temple's southern side would be more likely to support the heavier cella than the comparatively light pronaos, and that the temple's visual impact would have been greater if the façade faced north, from which direction the temple was generally accesse
--e6acc2abf54bee64e660c4bd271da544_1f401_71694
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head><meta charset="UTF-8"><meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title></title>
<style type="text/css">body {
max-width: 600px;
display: block;
margin: auto;
}
.footer {
max-width: 100%;
font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: .8rem;
text-align: center;
display: block;
padding-top: 30px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body><a href="http://dreamzyhumidifier.best/rbpyH9Wz8PRAQ1QoK2Xme9j9_i_4SpBNjNXXb3io5IwgFrehdg"><img src="http://dreamzyhumidifier.best/e958b15d842f42fc60.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.dreamzyhumidifier.best/VnszlDG2BNC6pSNyMdR8-XWDzzHUJC8iNHfrWPJZrutQdxKr9w" width="1" /></a>
<div style="width:500px;">
<table border="1" cellpadding="15" cellspacing="0" width="500">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="font-family:Times New Roman,Times,serif; font-size: 16px;">
<div style="color: #000000; line-height: normal; font-family:Times New Roman,Times,serif; font-size: 12px;">
<p style="padding-bottom: 15px;"><span style="font-size: 22px;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman,Times,serif;">What's your favorite <strong>sleeping position</strong>?</span></span></p>
<p style="padding-bottom: 15px;"><span style="font-size: 22px;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman,Times,serif;">This is important…</span></span></p>
<p style="padding-bottom: 15px;"><span style="font-size: 22px;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif;">Because a new bombshell discovery has revealed <a href="http://dreamzyhumidifier.best/kzFIM_VstH8WpNpH0ZwHYkufaHVpLUs2OfKYJ0VdY4WFDEN1iw"><span style="text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;"><strong>THIS 1 common sleeping position may cause dementia</strong></span></a>.</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center; padding-bottom: 15px;"><a href="http://dreamzyhumidifier.best/kzFIM_VstH8WpNpH0ZwHYkufaHVpLUs2OfKYJ0VdY4WFDEN1iw"><img alt="Common sleep positions" src="http://dreamzyhumidifier.best/989a0cd52d1b3171f2.jpg" style="width: 400px; height:300px;" /></a></p>
<p style="padding-bottom: 15px;"><span style="font-size: 22px;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman,Times,serif;"><em>Millions </em>are at risk and you might be as well!</span></span></p>
<p style="padding-bottom: 15px;"><a href="http://dreamzyhumidifier.best/kzFIM_VstH8WpNpH0ZwHYkufaHVpLUs2OfKYJ0VdY4WFDEN1iw"><span style="font-size: 22px;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman,Times,serif;"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong><u>Watch this video to learn more and save your memory before it's too late!</u></strong></span></span></span></a></p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<center><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://dreamzyhumidifier.best/5CwCCyZuCtL7idwq9hJKBDLFZDVcSlUlm3JbVkxrqdTCcyKp5Q" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://dreamzyhumidifier.best/0e991c801fcffdd744.png" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:10px;">the walls and columns of the temple's cella, surrounding a core of concrete (known to the Romans as opus caementicium). According to reconstructions made by the archaeologist Giuseppe Lugli, the temple had overall dimensions of 22.4 by 38.8 metres (73 by 127 ft), with a cella 26 metres (85 ft) long and a pronaos 12.8 metres (42 ft) in length. The surviving ruins do not allow a definitive reconstruction of the temple's orientation. It is generally believed to have faced south: the temple's first excavator, Pietro Rosa, proposed this orientation in 1865, on the grounds that it would have the temple face out of the hillside in a similar manner to earlier Republican hillside sanctuaries found elsewhere in Latium. In 1913, the prehistorian Giovanni Pinza suggested that the temple may have faced north, which he considered a better fit with the surviving accounts of its appearance in Roman literature, but his idea was generally rejected. Some modern hypotheses, such as that of Claridge, have argued for a north-facing temple on the grounds that the more substantial foundations of the temple's southern side would be more likely to support the heavier cella than the comparatively light pronaos, and that the temple's visual impact would have been greater if the façade faced north, from which direction the temple was generally accesse</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://dreamzyhumidifier.best/4RsTXg-vpR6rHBd1bYgO0C6RPPtwKMm3P4lK5-HdctAEdJR9gg" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://dreamzyhumidifier.best/384778ff55cde3e9ee.png" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
</center>
</body>
</html>
--e6acc2abf54bee64e660c4bd271da544_1f401_71694--
