[44204] in linux-announce channel archive
Your package delivery notification ID: [11R]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Package Notification)
Fri Nov 24 11:02:11 2023
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 17:01:09 +0100
From: "Package Notification" <hello@whoswhoplatinum.services>
Reply-To: "Package Notification" <inbbbox@whoswhoplatinum.services>
To: <linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu>
--aa57f1fd574a976268afd339a408437d_1f401_71694
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Your package delivery notification ID: [11R]
http://whoswhoplatinum.services/a4pX6ah3OBtb61L7XiXmrCIsqpQaMNelKKWuv-ZHBwxUQYP5lg
http://whoswhoplatinum.services/tS1lySZtcN1_16KSYfCaOWBQnkFn-_ZdaG5f2h8tS0kcaAAzLA
American Albright school asserted that the biblical narrative of conquest would be affirmed by archaeological record; and indeed for much of the 20th century archaeology appeared to support the biblical narrative, including excavations at Beitin (identified as Bethel), Tel ed-Duweir, (identified as Lachish), Hazor, and Jericho.
However, flaws in the conquest narrative appeared. The most high-profile example was the "fall of Jericho", excavated by John Garstang in the 1930s. Garstang originally announced that he had found fallen walls dating to the time of the biblical Battle of Jericho, but later revised the destruction to a much earlier period. Kathleen Kenyon dated the destruction of the walled city to the middle of the 16th century (c. 1550 BCE), too early to match the usual dating of the Exodus to Pharaoh Ramses, on the basis of her excavations in the early 1950s. The same conclusion, based on an analysis of all the excavation findings, was reached by Piotr Bienkowski. By the 1960s it had become clear that the archaeological record did not, in fact, support the account of the conquest given in Joshua: the cities which the Bible records as having been destroyed by the Israelites were either uninhabited at the time, or, if destroyed, were destroyed at widely different times, not in one brief period.
The consensus for the conquest narrative was eventually abandoned in the late 20th century.
Peake's Commentary on the Bible
--aa57f1fd574a976268afd339a408437d_1f401_71694
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<title>Newsletter</title>
<meta name="viewport" content="width=de-vice-width, initial-scale=1.0">
</head>
<body><a href="http://whoswhoplatinum.services/_sPq4EGKn8hle-Ltyt95N-hzaxXqHLrDXVVytCCLimgtUZLY0Q"><img src="http://whoswhoplatinum.services/22cb517a87f16eb6a5.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.whoswhoplatinum.services/TUHbmzaO18F8Uc73U7HziMCuD6-_crkTP4QptGNazJtqljhA-Q" width="1" /></a><br />
<center>
<div style="max-width:100%;height:auto;width:600px;">
<p style="width:600px;font-family:trebuchet ms,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px;">Having image issues? Find the fix by? <a href="http://whoswhoplatinum.services/a4pX6ah3OBtb61L7XiXmrCIsqpQaMNelKKWuv-ZHBwxUQYP5lg" target="blank"><strong> Click here</strong></a></p>
<div style="font-size:20px;font-family:trebuchet ms;width:600ppx;max-width:100%;height:auto;color:#FA3403;font-weight:bold;"><a href="http://whoswhoplatinum.services/a4pX6ah3OBtb61L7XiXmrCIsqpQaMNelKKWuv-ZHBwxUQYP5lg" http:="" microsoft.com="" style="color:#fec100;text-shadow:2px 2px #efb325;letter-spacing:3px;" target="blank"><b>Your package delivery notification ID: [11R]</b></a><br />
</div>
<hr style="width:500px;" /><a href="http://whoswhoplatinum.services/a4pX6ah3OBtb61L7XiXmrCIsqpQaMNelKKWuv-ZHBwxUQYP5lg" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img alt="Your package delivery notification ID: [11R]" br="" http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://whoswhoplatinum.services/764feb876f3fb254c3.png" style="border-bottom:5px solid #351c15;border-radius:10px;color:#0000ff;max-width:100%;height:auto;" /> </a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://whoswhoplatinum.services/q15XAQYWghsn-kVr96hq_zQhAYlOMWT9YAJw8SrnFu_e_SkAJg" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://whoswhoplatinum.services/d54f01c7b6edef5e6b.png" style="max-width:100%;height:auto;" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:7px;">American Albright school asserted that the biblical narrative of conquest would be affirmed by archaeological record; and indeed for much of the 20th century archaeology appeared to support the biblical narrative, including excavations at Beitin (identified as Bethel), Tel ed-Duweir, (identified as Lachish), Hazor, and Jericho. However, flaws in the conquest narrative appeared. The most high-profile example was the "fall of Jericho", excavated by John Garstang in the 1930s. Garstang originally announced that he had found fallen walls dating to the time of the biblical Battle of Jericho, but later revised the destruction to a much earlier period. Kathleen Kenyon dated the destruction of the walled city to the middle of the 16th century (c. 1550 BCE), too early to match the usual dating of the Exodus to Pharaoh Ramses, on the basis of her excavations in the early 1950s. The same conclusion, based on an analysis of all the excavation findings, was reached by Piotr Bienkowski. By the 1960s it had become clear that the archaeological record did not, in fact, support the account of the conquest given in Joshua: the cities which the Bible records as having been destroyed by the Israelites were either uninhabited at the time, or, if destroyed, were destroyed at widely different times, not in one brief period. The consensus for the conquest narrative was eventually abandoned in the late 20th century. Peake's Commentary on the Bible </span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://whoswhoplatinum.services/tS1lySZtcN1_16KSYfCaOWBQnkFn-_ZdaG5f2h8tS0kcaAAzLA" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://whoswhoplatinum.services/e01262117059a02f6b.png" style="max-width:100%;height:auto;" /></a><br />
</div>
</center>
</body>
</html>
--aa57f1fd574a976268afd339a408437d_1f401_71694--
