[10598] in linux-announce channel archive
Slim spray with yacon
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Slim Spray)
Thu Apr 17 09:34:55 2014
Envelope-to: linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 06:34:39 -0700
From: "Slim Spray" <SlimSpray@thungradulaep.us>
To: <linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu>
Reply-To: <bounce-71675797@thungradulaep.us>
--__________MIMEboundary__________
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
As seen on ABC's Shark Tank
http://www.thungradulaep.us/l/lt24ADT5180FXYM194J/438EGOJ1562Q3231NCQAI10B71675797ISACI1410730897
Unsub- http://www.thungradulaep.us/l/lc10PXT5180CFVR194G/438YLNA1562N3231ALTJA10D71675797ANFSN1410730897
ngs of the Group of Eight and
Group of 20. He is responsible for coordinating White House policy on
international trade, investments, energy, climate and development.Froman
served during President Bill Clinton's administration as chief of staff
to Treasury Secretary Robert E. Rubin. He also worked as deputy assistant
secretary for Eurasia and the Middle East and did a White House
stint similar to his current job under Obama.Before joining the Obama economic
and national security teams he worked in various capacities at Citigroup,
including managing partner of the Wall Street bank. He also has been
a senior fellow at the Council of Foreign Relations and a resident
fellow at the German Marshall Fund.Among the top ongoing trade issues are
negotiations over the Trans-Pacific partnership, an Asia-Pacific trading
bloc that is key to Obama's efforts to boost exports to Asia.
Members include the U.S., Australia, Canada, Malaysia, Mexico, Vietnam,
Chile, New Zealand, Brunei, Singapore and Peru. Last month, the U.S. approved
Japan's entry into negotiations on the trading bloc.
A new missile is carried during a mass military parade at the
Kim Il Sung Square in Pyongyang, North Korea.APNorth Korea is nearing completion
of a light-water reactor that is primarily intended to generate electricity
but which could add to concern over its nuclear program, a U.S.-based
institute said Wednesday.Satellite photos, the latest taken this month,
show the North appears to be putting finishing external touches to the
reactor at its Yongbyon nuclear complex, according to 38 North, the website
of the U.S.-Korea Institute at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International
Studies in Washington. The reactor could potentially begin operation within
a year or so, although considerable technical hurdles remain, 38 North says
in its analysis.Light-water reactors are best-suited for electricity generation,
and U.S. academics who visited the site in 2010 when construction of
the reactor began said it appeared designed for that purpose. It might
be adapted to produce plutonium for weapons, but North Korea already has
what's known as a gas-graphite reactor, which provides an easier option
for making bomb fuel.North Korea announced in early April it was restarting
the older reactor from which it is estimated to have derived enough
plutonium for a half-dozen bombs before it was shuttered in 2007 during
aid-for-disarmament negotiations. The announcement came amid a torrent of
war threats from Pyongyang after the U.N. Security Council tightened
--__________MIMEboundary__________
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.thungradulaep.us/l/lt18YJW5180DSME194O/438QJMI1562R3231OWFOM10I71675797CGRCJ1410730897"><H3>As seen on ABC's Shark Tank</a></H3></strong>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<center><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#333333; font-size: 10px;">
If you can't read or see this e-mail. <a href="http://www.thungradulaep.us/l/lt18RRP5180NIGI194J/438RHMM1562T3231QCMBQ10U71675797SFTBV1410730897" target="_blank">Click here</a> or enable image viewing on your browser.</span></center>
<br>
<table width="500" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tr>
<td><div align="center"><a href="http://www.thungradulaep.us/l/lt18GLX5180MDAY194W/438UQKD1562Y3231UOQCB10E71675797XSIMV1410730897" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.thungradulaep.us/im/YKQFE5180T194BNFCA/438K1562CB3231K10YRUCQS71675797QI1410730897/img019443843.jpg" width="650" height="450" border="0" style="display:block;"></a></div></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" align="center"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color:#666666; font-size: 10px;"><br>
<a href="http://www.thungradulaep.us/l/lc4WUO5180XPWK194L/438VUED1562A3231YHPEJ10R71675797RNTCN1410730897" target="_blank">Update Preferences</a>
<br><br>
PO Box 26452
Minneapolis, MN 55426
</span></td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu
<br />
<a href="http://www.thungradulaep.us/unsLWRF5180RJ194P/438RGEPVD1562AHBXN3231FX10MON71675797TX1410730897" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.thungradulaep.us/im/HLLBN5180B194PMTUF/438F1562MY3231L10SOHVQQ71675797WO1410730897/img119443843.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">uffer financial catastrophe upon divorce, and that
the lower-earning spouse and stay-at-home parent will not be financially
punished. Floridians have relied on this system post-divorce and planned
their lives accordingly."The proposed law also would have set limits on
the amount of alimony and how long one would receive financial support
from an ex-spouse.The bill would have made it harder to get alimony
in short-term marriages. And it would have prevented alimony payments from
lasting longer than one-half of the length of the marriage.It also would
have required judges to give divorced parents equal custody of their children
absent extraordinary circumstances."I'm actually surprised," said Jason
Marks, a divorce attorney in Miami, about the veto. The bill had
passed the House 85-31, with members of both parties crossing over. The
Senate approved it 29-11."My assumption is, you haven't heard the last of
it," Marks said. "Most family law practitioners will agree that uniformity
in determination of alimony is a good thing."The bill said that in
a short-term marriage, defined as less than 11 years, the assumption is
that alimony would not be awarded. If alimony were granted, it would
not be more than 25 percent of the ex-spouse's gross income.For marriages
that last between 11 and 20 years, there's no assumption either way
in the bill, but alimony would not have amounted to more than
35 percent of the ex-spouse's gross income.And in marria
uffer financial catastrophe upon divorce, and that
the lower-earning spouse and stay-at-home parent will not be financially
punished. Floridians have relied on this system post-divorce and planned
their lives accordingly."The proposed law also would have set limits on
the amount of alimony and how long one would receive financial support
from an ex-spouse.The bill would have made it harder to get alimony
in short-term marriages. And it would have prevented alimony payments from
lasting longer than one-half of the length of the marriage.It also would
have required judges to give divorced parents equal custody of their children
absent extraordinary circumstances."I'm actually surprised," said Jason
Marks, a divorce attorney in Miami, about the veto. The bill had
passed the House 85-31, with members of both parties crossing over. The
Senate approved it 29-11."My assumption is, you haven't heard the last of
it," Marks said. "Most family law practitioners will agree that uniformity
in determination of alimony is a good thing."The bill said that in
a short-term marriage, defined as less than 11 years, the assumption is
that alimony would not be awarded. If alimony were granted, it would
not be more than 25 percent of the ex-spouse's gross income.For marriages
that last between 11 and 20 years, there's no assumption either way
in the bill, but alimony would not have amounted to more than
35 percent of the ex-spouse's gross income.And in marria
</p>
</html>
--__________MIMEboundary__________--
