[2211] in SIPB bug reports
Re: man rsh on quiche-lorraine
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ambar@Athena.MIT.EDU)
Tue Oct 29 15:11:18 1991
From: ambar@Athena.MIT.EDU
To: "Barr3y Jaspan" <bjaspan@Athena.MIT.EDU>
Cc: bug-sipb@Athena.MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 29 Oct 91 14:43:52 -0500.
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 91 15:10:22 EST
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Oct 91 14:43:52 -0500, "Barr3y Jaspan" <bjaspan@Athena.MIT.EDU> said:
Barr3y> I said that I would deal with the proposal. I have busy and haven't
Barr3y> gotten to it -- that much is my fault. However, as I haven't seen
Barr3y> evidence of many people doing much interesting with the machine,
Barr3y> perhaps my time spent working on the proposal will be wasted; perhaps
Barr3y> we should just send it back.
This is partly a chicken-and-egg problem. No one wants to sink a lot of
time into working on a machine that isn't definitely ours. Lately, I've
been working on bringing up the latest gdb and gcc (1.95), with help
from Ken. I also think that having an 80?86 handy to play with the new
BSD stuff would be a good thing. I, for one, would like to see the
machine's state change from 'limbo' to something known, and in a
reasonable amount of time.
AMBAR
