[25] in Zephyr_Bugs
[pete@ATHENA.MIT.EDU: Zephyr problems]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathan I. Kamens)
Mon May 21 12:30:31 1990
Date: Mon, 21 May 90 12:30:08 -0400
From: "Jonathan I. Kamens" <jik@pit-manager.MIT.EDU>
To: raeburn@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
Cc: bug-zephyr@ATHENA.MIT.EDU, release@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: raeburn@ATHENA.MIT.EDU's message of Sat, 19 May 90 03:15:56 EDT <9005190716.AA15327@STEVE-DALLAS.MIT.EDU>
From: raeburn@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
Date: Sat, 19 May 90 03:15:56 EDT
>> Date: Thu, 17 May 90 09:43:26 -0400
>> From: "Jonathan I. Kamens" <jik@PIT-MANAGER.MIT.EDU>
>>
>> This seems to be a questionable decision. It seems to me that, given
>> a choice over which way to default, we should have defaulted to the
>> same thing we defaulted to in the previous release.
Probably true. I would suggest punting the relevant changes to both
zwgc.desc and zwrite. (But keep the $fromhost stuff in zwgc.desc, and
the number_of_fields fix to zwrite.) Shall I put together new versions?
Yes, please provide us with a fixed version of zwrite that defaults to
PRETTY, or that doesn't deal with PRETTY at all, and a fixed zwgc.desc
that doesn't care about PRETTY.
jik
