[2570] in Release_Engineering
[timo@ATHENA.MIT.EDU: Your OLC question about "emacs"]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Fri Mar 1 14:20:06 1991
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 91 13:31:43 -0500
From: "Jonathan I. Kamens" <jik@pit-manager.MIT.EDU>
To: rel-eng@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
Any particular reason why it's not stripped?
I guess if it's demand paged, it doesn't really matter, but still.
Also, is it still compiled with -g? If so, we should fix that too.
jik
----- Forwarded message
From: timo@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 91 20:54:23 -0500
To: release@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
Cc: "Krishna `Shamu' Sethuraman" <krishna@ATHENA.MIT.EDU>
Subject: Your OLC question about "emacs"
--------
Hi!
Sorry we couldn't answer your question while you were logged in.
You asked:
> Why isn't /usr/bin/X11/emacs on the vaxes stripped?
Unseen messages:
*** Reply from consultant timo@NAVIGATOR.MIT.EDU [1].
[Wed 27-Feb-91 8:52pm]
You asked:
> Why isn't /usr/bin/X11/emacs on the vaxes stripped?
It isn't stripped because no one bothered to strip it.
Are you all set now? If so, please type "done" at the "olc>" prompt.
Otherwise, ask ahead ...
Seriously, shouldn't it be stripped?
Tim O'Malley
<timo@athena.mit.edu>
Project Athena Consultant
----- End of forwarded message
