[2381] in Release_Engineering
[jfc@ATHENA.MIT.EDU: /usr/new/lib/ contents]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathan I. Kamens)
Tue Jun 26 16:41:51 1990
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 90 16:41:39 -0400
From: "Jonathan I. Kamens" <jik@pit-manager.MIT.EDU>
To: rel-eng@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
I see no problem with deleting /usr/new/lib/rn, but what about
/usr/new/lib/X.... is there anything that depends on it being there?
I would think not, but I'm not certain.
----- Forwarded message
To: bugs@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
Subject: /usr/new/lib/ contents
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 90 00:30:12 EDT
From: John Carr <jfc@ATHENA.MIT.EDU>
% ls /srvd/usr/new/lib/X
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root 12 May 3 19:25 /srvd/usr/new/lib/X -> /usr/lib/X10
X10 hasn't been "new" for a while now.
% ls -a /srvd/usr/new/lib/news/
total 4
drwxr-xr-x 2 root 2048 Nov 11 1984 .
drwxr-xr-x 6 root 2048 May 3 22:03 ..
There's no reason for this to exist.
% ls -a /srvd/usr/new/lib/rn
total 4
drwxr-xr-x 2 root 2048 Nov 12 1985 .
drwxr-xr-x 6 root 2048 May 3 22:03 ..
Nor this.
----- End of forwarded message
