[93335] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Eternity Services

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anonymous)
Fri Jan 16 19:13:48 1998

Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 00:43:46 +0100 (MET)
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
From: nobody@replay.com (Anonymous)
Reply-To: nobody@replay.com (Anonymous)

Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> wrote:

> And the demand for such ecash systems is real. I personally carried a $10
> million offer for a non-exclusive license for the blind signature patent
> to David Chaum. He declined the offer. "The patent is not for license".
> DigiCash's CEO since March of last year, Mike Nash, also told me that
> DigiCash was not considering licensing the patent. I knew that day that it
> was time to quit. Not surprisingly, nobody heard from DigiCash since.

You could challenge the patent, and probably win, for less than $10
million.  There is quite a bit of prior art that Chaum neglected to
disclose, especially a certain incident where Chaum, as editor of
Crypto '84 proceedings, tried to supress part of ElGamal's paper which
discussed 'signature conversion' (aka blind signatures).


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post