[93063] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Humor] Kennedy's New Legislation

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Honig)
Mon Jan 12 13:50:09 1998

Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 09:08:24 -0800
To: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM), cypherpunks@toad.com
From: David Honig <honig@otc.net>
In-Reply-To: <e9B6ie60w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply-To: David Honig <honig@otc.net>

At 09:17 AM 1/11/98 EST, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
>David Honig <honig@otc.net> writes:
>>
>> Bogus reasoning.  You are sovereign and can do with yourself as you please.
>>  *That* is why substances should be legal and helmets should be optional.
>> Pragmatics are irrelevant.  I *do*
>> wear seatbelts but it should be my choice, not
>> something the state can use violence to enforce.
>
>The above is just one of the reasons why all drugs should be legalized.

Yes, that was the moral one.

>As for helmets, seatbelts, et al, consider them in context: most kids
>stupid enough to ride a bike wihtout a helmet are already on welfare.
>If they get themselves certified brain-damaged (I don't know how the
>doctors tell the difference :-) they'll be stealing even more of my money
>through taxes. Therefore in the context of taxpayers paying the medical
>bills of these parasites, helmets can be required.

There is a shortage of organ donors.  Motorcycle helmet laws cut 
down the supply.  There's your pragmatics, happy now?




------------------------------------------------------------
      David Honig                   Orbit Technology
     honig@otc.net                  Intaanetto Jigyoubu

	"How do you know you are not being deceived?" 
	---A Compendium of Analytic TradeCraft Notes, 
	     Directorate of Intelligence, CIA
	     http://www.jya.com/cia-notes.htm













home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post