[92965] in Cypherpunks
Re: In God We Antitrust, from the Netly News
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adam Back)
Sat Jan 10 19:33:44 1998
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 21:40:40 GMT
From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
To: tcmay@got.net
CC: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
In-reply-to: <v03102800b0dc2d3e93db@[207.167.93.63]> (message from Tim May on
Fri, 9 Jan 1998 12:11:44 -0800)
Reply-To: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Tim May <tcmay@got.net> writes:
> [snip]
> The AMD K6 may not be quite the dog the K5 was,
I've got a K5, seems like a fine CPU to me... around the performance
of a P166 for about 1/2 the price.
Why do you say the K5 is a dog?
K6 is similarly value for money.
I also bought a AMD 486 120Mhz a while ago for similar value for money
reasons.
I thought for a while Cyrix or AMD had faster processors available
than Intel. (Just prior to to Pentium II, where the Pentium Pro was
highly priced and for some applications slower than an Pentium clocked
at the same speed).
I may not be off to buy AMD stock, but I like competition, and will
buy AMD or Cyrix any time they have a cheaper and compatible product.
Adam
--
Now officially an EAR violation...
Have *you* exported RSA today? --> http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`
