[92844] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Remailers & N.E.T.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Declan McCullagh)
Thu Jan 8 18:52:35 1998

In-Reply-To: <v03102803b0daeb29f609@[207.167.93.63]>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 18:23:24 -0500
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Cc: cypherpunks@algebra.com
Reply-To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>

I would be very afraid of relying on the CDA's immunizing provisions as my
sole defense against prosecution, conviction, and jail time, were I a
remailer operator.

-Declan


At 12:47 -0800 1/8/98, Tim May wrote:
>(Though the SPA and others may then go after the remailers. Ironically, the
>CDA exempted remailers--though not by name--from liability for messages.)



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post