|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: wayne clerke <wclerke@emirates.net.ae> To: "'cypherpunks@rigel.cyberpass.net'" <cypherpunks@rigel.cyberpass.net> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 01:32:19 -0000 Reply-To: wayne clerke <wclerke@emirates.net.ae> On Tuesday, December 30, 1997 7:56 AM, Mark Hedges [SMTP:hedges@rigel.cyberpass.net] wrote: > > > We found IRC users to be so involved in petty information wars -- > ping floods, malicious prank hacking, and the like -- that we directed > policy against use of IRC from the anonymous shell accounts at CyberPass. > > If IRC users weren't so easily lulled by the tempation to crash a server > or run malicious bots or just plain irritate other people for fun, and > if they would gang up and kick out people who did that, then perhaps we'd > switch that back on. > > They were just too much overhead. Everyone else seems pretty nice, really, > as far as the system goes. They're all self-interested in keeping the > anonymous publishing and so on going, so the peace keeps itself. What's the reason behind the policy direction against the use of personal web proxies running in a (paid for) shell account? Seems like less risk than you already accept anyway. Something I've missed? > > Mark Hedges > Infonex and Anonymizer > > Mail: <a href= mailto:wclerke@emirates.net.ae >Wayne Clerke</a> PGP key id: AEB2546D F/P: D663D11EDA19D74F5032DC7EE001B702 PGP key id: 57AA1C10 F/P: 9926BF8918B7EB3623A7 AFA46572C5B857AA1C10 PGP mail welcome. Voice: +971 506 43 4853 If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |