[87691] in Cypherpunks
Re: Stronghold
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (phelix@vallnet.com)
Sun Oct 5 06:26:38 1997
To: cypherpunks@algebra.com
From: phelix@vallnet.com
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 1997 09:50:26 GMT
Reply-To: phelix@vallnet.com
On 5 Oct 1997 00:21:33 -0500, nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous) wrote:
>
>John Young wrote:
>> Dimitri:
>> Perhaps this is unfair, but it now appears that you are using
>> the disputed censorship issue to cloud your reluctance, or
>> inability, to substantiate a fault in Stronghold.
>
>Unless C2Net publicly announces that Dimitri is free to post
>anything he chooses about C2Net and the software they produce,
>without threat of lawsuit or prosecution, then it is patently
>unfair to castigate him for failing to share whatever information
>he may have in regard to their product.
>Like it or not, C2Net has declared that the integrity of their
>product is dependent upon men with guns who have the power to
>take people before the inquisitors, squelching all intimations
>of weakness or impropriety in the design of their product.
>
Use the remailers. That's what they're there for. Am I being overly
simplistic here?
-- Phelix
