[87671] in Cypherpunks
InforWar 31 / (Part III of 'The True Story of the InterNet')
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Deja Vu)
Sat Oct 4 16:21:54 1997
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 1997 13:27:43 -0600
From: Deja Vu <dv@dev.null>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Reply-To: Deja Vu <dv@dev.null>
<BASE HREF="file:///C|/CJ/WRITING/InfoWar/InfoWar31.htm">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<TITLE>The True Story of the Internet Part II</TITLE>
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Internet Assistant for Microsoft Word 2.04z">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<HR>
<HR>
<P>
<CENTER><U><FONT COLOR=#0000FF>The True Story of the InterNet
<BR>
Part III<BR>
</FONT></U></CENTER>
<P>
<CENTER><B><FONT SIZE=7 COLOR=#800000>Info</FONT><FONT SIZE=7 COLOR=#FF0000>War</FONT></B></CENTER>
<P>
<CENTER><U><B><FONT SIZE=4>Final Frontier of the Digital Revolution</FONT></B></U></CENTER>
<P>
<CENTER><U><B><FONT SIZE=2 COLOR=#800000>Behind the ElectroMagnetic
Curtain<BR>
</FONT></B></U></CENTER>
<P>
<CENTER><FONT SIZE=2>by <I><B>TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
<BR>
<BR>
</B></I></FONT></CENTER>
<P>
<FONT SIZE=2>Copyright 1997 Pearl Publishing</FONT>
<HR>
<HR>
<P>
<CENTER><U><B>InfoWar Table of Contents<BR>
</B></U></CENTER>
<UL>
<LI><A HREF="#Chapter_31" >Anarchist Post of the Century</A>
<LI><A HREF="#Chapter_32" >Anarchist Post of the Century</A><BR>
</UL>
<HR>
<P>
<CENTER><A NAME="Chapter_31"><B>Anarchist Post of the Century</B></A></CENTER>
<HR>
<P>
<B>Subject:</B> Freedom of Encryption: Is it SAFE?<BR>
<B>From:</B> "Michael Pierson" <wfgodot@advicom.net>
<BR>
<B>To: </B>cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
<P>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
<P>
There has been much discussion recently concerning how to fix
<BR>
certain flaws, or block various amendments in encryption<BR>
legislation being shepherded through Congress. A far more<BR>
fundamental problem with these legislative efforts from the<BR>
beginning was that they involved an implicit concession to the
<BR>
idea that a U.S. citizen's freedom to privately exchange<BR>
information in whatever coding scheme he or she might choose<BR>
required some kind of government affirmation or ratification as
<BR>
validation. Once one seeks for the government's deigning to<BR>
"affirm the rights of United States persons to use and sell
<BR>
encryption", it can (and does) then easily proceed to attach
<BR>
conditions and caveats to these "affirmed" rights.
In the<BR>
process the surveillance hawks within the government have<BR>
managed, with hardly any struggle, to advance the appearance of
<BR>
legitimacy for their claims of authority to regulate this form
of<BR>
expression.
<P>
Now comes an expectation that the nature of these "affirmed
<BR>
rights" should be tailored to address "the concerns
of national<BR>
security and the federal law enforcement community." This
same<BR>
community has on occasion complained about how their efforts to
<BR>
fight organized crime and terrorism are being thwarted by not
<BR>
having the modern newspeak disguised equivalent of "Writs
of <BR>
Assistance" (and they are arguably making progress toward
<BR>
acquiring just such powers IMO). Very few politicians are <BR>
willing to commit the heresy of clearly and staunchly asserting
<BR>
that the information coding methods used by citizens are under
<BR>
no obligation to pass any litmus test, or to be subject to any
<BR>
kind of prior approval or restraint determined by criteria of
<BR>
the law enforcement establishment or anyone else. If the Feds
<BR>
lament that this will make their job harder, too bad. In the
<BR>
words of Orson Welles: "Only in a police state is the job
of a <BR>
policeman easy."
<P>
When these various legislative efforts attempted to reach beyond
<BR>
the issues of export restrictions to address those of domestic
<BR>
use, they became a doubtful and dangerous fix to something that
<BR>
wasn't broke in the first place. If the Government is intent
on<BR>
"abridging the freedom" to use strong encryption domestically,
a<BR>
legislative affirmation of these rights is feeble comfort at<BR>
best. If I'm seeking to protect my possessions, I don't ask a
<BR>
thief to affirm my property rights.
<P>
Of course, even the export question is really about the aims of
<BR>
the state's surveillance constituency to obstruct the wide<BR>
deployment of strong encryption domestically, and its<BR>
interoperability on the internet as a whole. Challenging the
<BR>
derisible bogosity of the "preventing the Evil Ones from
<BR>
acquiring this technology" rationale that is invoked to justify
<BR>
these restrictions was not something legislation was likely to
do<BR>
with any great vigor. Legislation to "relax" these
restrictions<BR>
involves lending credence to the dubious assumption that these
<BR>
restrictions had any constitutional validity to begin with.
<P>
Any bill that would have truly provided for the statutory<BR>
endorsement of the acceptably uncompromised use of strong<BR>
encryption never really had much more than a snowball's chance
in<BR>
hell of actually being signed into law given the current<BR>
political balance of power, did it? Far more likely, was that
it<BR>
could be corrupted and hijacked as a vehicle to further the very
<BR>
type of restrictions it was purportedly intended to relieve.
A<BR>
collateral consequence is an increased arrogance and presumption
<BR>
among lawmakers that it is their prerogative to act to define
for<BR>
us citizens, what freedoms for domestic use of encryption we<BR>
should be permitted. The growing gallery of GAK amendments and
<BR>
competing legislative proposals now emerging appears to support
<BR>
this sad scenario.
<P>
It's starting to look like the prospects for meaningfully<BR>
improving the situation with encryption legislation in the<BR>
current political environment were about as promising as the<BR>
prospects of a neophyte gambler coming out ahead at a crooked
<BR>
casino. I expect any apparent winnings in the end will come with
<BR>
a catch between the lines in the fine print, if they come at all.
<BR>
In any case, whatever is legislatively affirmed can later be<BR>
legislatively denied. What a King presumes is his to grant, he
<BR>
usually presumes is his to revoke as well.
<P>
In the end, what will have really been gained by this legislative
<BR>
venture, and what will have been explicitly or implicitly<BR>
surrendered? As I see it, at this point the issue isn't about
<BR>
counting wins, it's about cutting losses.
<P>
Freedom of encryption.... Is it SAFE? I don't think so.
<P>
-Michael
<P>
<FONT SIZE=2>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<BR>
Version: 2.6.3a<BR>
Charset: noconv<BR>
<BR>
iQCVAwUBNDVks9GJlWF+GPx9AQGctwQAlE+SKB3/rqG7kz3qdcF2I5eBedz3/DDK
<BR>
f5Vg0Zd8PbhowwT9gWAvyt+ysIZCqRJWMu3vPmWP2iN2ZghLaiGRVv8piXhyUQYl
<BR>
rhv/rOz1Yc1raJbU5Wk+9Qr9zxQqxHZiAk1G0Irye4yDfi72ar8ndD5CqUegBnaF
<BR>
QAoyFGtiJZ4=<BR>
=2zJO<BR>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<BR>
</FONT>
<HR>
<P>
<CENTER><A NAME="Chapter_32"><B>Anarchist Post of the Century</B></A></CENTER>
<HR>
<P>
<B>Subject:</B> DejaVu: Cypherpunks as Philosopher Kings<BR>
<B>From:</B> "Attila T. Hun" <attila@hun.org>
<BR>
<B>Reply-To:</B> "Attila T. Hun" <attila@primenet.com>
<BR>
<B>Organization:</B> home for unpenitent hackers; no crackers!
<BR>
<B>To:</B> "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>, cypherpunks
<cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
<P>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
<P>
ten months ago: on or about 961218:1123 <BR>
"Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net> purported
to expostulate:
<P>
+_Direct action_ is what it's all about. Undermining the state
through<BR>
+the spread of espionage networks, through undermining faith in
the tax<BR>
+system, through even more direct applications of the right tools
at the<BR>
+right times.<BR>
+<BR>
+When Cypherpunks are called "terrorists," we will have
done our jobs.
<P>
[Tim] said this before Christmas last year as an erudite and
lengthy<BR>
addendum to my lengthy tome: "Cypherpunks as Philosophy
Kings" <BR>
that pretty well summed our generally mutually agreed "philosophy".
<P>
both were and still are worth reading; anybody who does not
have<BR>
copies, ask.
<P>
but cypherpunk terrorists are not violent; this is all about
making<BR>
information free and protecting privacy with technology.
<P>
despite the fact the Commerce Committee effectively killed
SAFE<BR>
(or we think they did until Oxley tries to tack his amendment
<BR>
structure on an appropriations bill in a house-senate conference
or<BR>
"manager's mark" procedure (whatever that is)),
we can not drop the <BR>
due diligence, and the public must be aroused, called to battle.
<BR>
even if there is no action, prepare for the next fire drill.
sow the<BR>
seeds of dissension.
<P>
seems to me we were sure the CDA was dead --except it slipped
in with <BR>
a manager's mark after the house voted almost unanimously
the other<BR>
way (402-12 or something like that). the capitol hill sleaze
<BR>
took a grand slam NO and reported an even worse yes, making
it part<BR>
of a major bill that absolutely was going to pass --and they
<BR>
have the gall to call that travesty democracy? Teddy Roosevelt:
<P>
"It is difficult to make our material condition better
by the <BR>
best law, but it is easy enough to ruin it by bad laws."
<P>
Tim's message for Christmas last was the prophetic call for
direct<BR>
action; legal action; empowerment action: Robert H. Jackson
<BR>
(1892-1954), U.S. Judge:
<P>
"It is not the function of our Government to keep
the citizen <BR>
from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen
to<BR>
keep the Government from falling into error."
<P>
<CENTER><B>CYPHERPUNKS MUST BE THE JOHNNY APPLESEED </B></CENTER>
<P>
<CENTER><B>OF THE INFORMATION AGE.</B></CENTER>
<P>
the sleazeball, who intends to make J Edgar look like a piker
at <BR>
surveillance, has the gleam of unabridged power in his eyes.
Louis <BR>
F[reeh,uck] is charming, even disarming, as he tells a Congressional
<BR>
committee:<BR>
"We are potentially the most dangerous agency in
the <BR>
country if we are not scrutinized carefully." (Jun
'97)
<P>
meaning the FBI will be the most powerful [feared] federal
agency?<BR>
really? I thought it was already, although the DEA and BATF
have <BR>
worked hard for the title, too.
<P>
Supreme Justice Louis O. Brandeis said:<BR>
"The greatest danger to liberty lurks in insidious
encroachment <BR>
by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding."
<P>
and the [London] Electronic Telegraph, on Sunday's front page:
<BR>
Mr. Freeh has won $370 million (ú230 million) of
<BR>
funding for 2,000 new posts, boosted the number of<BR>
active agents to more than 11,000, and expanded<BR>
open-ended "domestic security operations" from
100 in<BR>
1995 to more than 800. Twenty-three new FBI offices<BR>
are opening abroad.
<P>
and more:
<P>
But none of this will contain the director's ambitions
<BR>
or his power. He is now believed to be eyeing two<BR>
other "secret police" forces - the Drug Enforcement
<BR>
Agency and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms
<BR>
- with a long-term view to a takeover.
<P>
F[reeh,uck] holds the key to the Clinton's' ambitions; the
Clintons <BR>
cite the Roosevelts as their mentors; Hillary even communes
with the<BR>
long dead Eleanor. Bubba's stated goals included extending
FDR's <BR>
"chicken in every pot" --he's just appeasing the
crowd now.
<P>
Leopards do not change their spots, but Bubba has shifted
to the <BR>
right with public opinion; he is just like the leopard: playing
with<BR>
his food until sufficient presidential powers have been accumulated
<BR>
by the default of Congress and the people.
<P>
But, the INFORMATION REVOLUTION now stands in way of the Clinton
<BR>
plans; the Internet can destroy the media control now exercised
by<BR>
the acquiescence of the five Jewish media barons. In fact,
it is <BR>
destroying their monopoly.
<P>
<CENTER><B>THE CONTROL OF INFORMATION IS THE CONTROL OF POWER.</B>
</CENTER>
<P>
Why does F[reeh,uck] hold the key? Because his job is to
sell the <BR>
Congress on strangling the information revolution before it
destroys<BR>
truthless governments F[reeh,uck]'s masters understand and
control.
<P>
Franklin D. Roosevelt was inaugurated on 4 Mar 33 stating:
<BR>
"I am prepared under my constitutional duty to <BR>
recommend the measures that a stricken nation in the<BR>
midst of a stricken world may require. These<BR>
measures, or such other measures as the Congress may<BR>
build out of its experience and wisdom, I shall<BR>
seek, within my constitutional authority, to bring<BR>
to speedy adoption. But in the event that the<BR>
Congress shall fall to take one of these two <BR>
courses, and in the event that the national<BR>
emergency is still critical, I shall not evade the<BR>
clear course of duty that will then confront me. I<BR>
shall ask the Congress for the one remaining<BR>
instrument to meet the crisis broad Executive power<BR>
to wage a war against the emergency, as great as the<BR>
power that would be given to me if we were in fact<BR>
invaded by a foreign foe."
<P>
and, on 9 Mar 33, 5 days later, FDR extracted from an uniformed
<BR>
and essentially special session of Congress:<BR>
"Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives
of<BR>
the United States of America in Congress assembled, That
the<BR>
Congress hereby declares that a serious emergency exists
and<BR>
that it is imperatively necessary speedily to put into
effect<BR>
remedies of uniform national application."
<P>
which was based on the War Powers Act (trading with the Enemy)
of<BR>
1917 which was hastily revised to include US Citizens which
had been<BR>
exempted. Next, FDR "franchised" the banks, "licensed"
agriculture<BR>
and so on. But, to render the citizens powerless and to confiscate
<BR>
all assets so the national state was the ultimate owner, and
<BR>
therefore able to pledge the people for credit to the international
<BR>
bankers, the fundamental monetary system changed:<BR>
"Whenever in the judgment of the Secretary of the
<BR>
Treasury, such action is necessary to protect the <BR>
currency system of the United States, the Secretary <BR>
of the Treasury, in his discretion, may require any <BR>
or all individuals, partnerships, associations and <BR>
corporations to pay and deliver to the Treasurer <BR>
of the United States any or all gold coin, gold<BR>
bullion, and gold certificates owned by such <BR>
individuals, partnerships, associations and <BR>
corporations."
<P>
which closed the loop and made every US citizen chattel as
FDR <BR>
pledged the good faith and credit of the United States to
the <BR>
international bankers --in return, an unbelievable flood of
credit <BR>
was available since the good faith and credit of the United
States <BR>
is "We the People...." but FDR sold us downstream
into a debt <BR>
financed economy from which there is no escape; we are still
there,<BR>
the debt service is destroying any permanent economy AND total
<BR>
collapse under the debt load is bequeathed to our children.
<P>
Congress repealed FDR's rubber stamp for the "President"
in 1973,<BR>
but the War Powers Act remains, still modified to treat US
<BR>
citizens as the enemy. and the power of the "President"
to make <BR>
those regulations, and the automatic approval are enshrined
for<BR>
current and future Presidents in Title 12 USC 95(b)<BR>
"The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders
and <BR>
proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated,
made,<BR>
or issued by the President of the United States or the
Secretary<BR>
of the Treasury since March the 4th, 1933, pursuant to
the<BR>
authority conferred by subdivision (b) of Section 5 of
the Act<BR>
of October 6, 1917, as amended, are hereby approved and
<BR>
confirmed."
<P>
The real issue is the President and the fat cat power brokers
can <BR>
get away with these shenanigans __as_long_as_the_people_let_them__.
<BR>
We are still under the Rule of Necessity. We are still in
a declared<BR>
state of national emergency, a state of emergency which has
existed,<BR>
uninterrupted, since 1933.
<P>
FDR's licensing agencies were rather trivial in number; today
there <BR>
are thousands of them, many with their own administrative
courts. <BR>
FDR took away our common law when he bankrupted America, which
is a <BR>
national corporation under the Hague convention (courtesy
of Stanton<BR>
and Seward after the Civil War). Bankruptcy is a contract,
and <BR>
we are the bait, subject to that court, which is in effect
an <BR>
Admiralty court, and we are "licensed" to literally
exist by FDR's <BR>
Social Security Number schema. and every courtroom now flies
the <BR>
fringed Admiralty flag where habeas corpus is a privilege,
not a <BR>
right, if it exists at all.
<P>
This is the importance of Louis F[reeh,uck]. He, and Janet
Reno as <BR>
the DOJ rubber stamp, are holding the collar for your neck.
They<BR>
are selling it to you little by little, or even all at once.
<P>
Why Louis F[reeh,uck]? Madison Avenue style with credentials;
he<BR>
can sell the program. F[reeh,uck] is the front man, the schill.
<P>
Machiavelli, in his "Discourses of Livy," acknowledged
that great <BR>
power may have to be given to the Executive if the State is
to<BR>
survive, but warned of great dangers in doing so. He cautioned:
<BR>
Nor is it sufficient if this power be conferred <BR>
upon good men; for men are frail, and easily <BR>
corrupted, and then in a short time, he that is <BR>
absolute may easily corrupt the people."
<P>
sleazeball's comments are scarfed by Congress, sleazeball's
candor<BR>
rocks their cradles, sleazeball shows them private morality
plays<BR>
about a populace running wild with crypto-anarchy, running
wild <BR>
to burn out the offices of central power... in other words:
<P>
<CENTER><B>DEPRIVE THEM CONGRESSCRITTERS OF THEIR<BR>
FREE LUNCH AND IMMUNITY</B>.</CENTER>
<P>
is it not odd that the more the government tries to abridge
our free<BR>
speech rights, the more they want to confiscate our weapons?
<P>
free speech is a weapon of democracy!<BR>
privacy is a weapon of democracy!<BR>
cryptography is a weapon of democracy!
<P>
We are not fighting with guns and explosives this time, armed
<BR>
insurrection against the power of the Federal government is
<BR>
suicidal --we are fighting for our lives and the right to
live our<BR>
lives with words: the ability to hear those words _before_
<BR>
government censors and spin doctors render them useless lies.
<P>
Bubba can not win a war of truth and information; we can/
<P>
The Marquis de Sade:<BR>
Are not laws dangerous which inhibit the passions? <BR>
Compare the centuries of anarchy with those of the <BR>
strongest legalism in any country you like and you will
<BR>
see that it is only when the laws are silent that the
<BR>
greatest actions appear.
<P>
however, anarchy is the key word that ignites even the ACLU
against<BR>
your cause; it even makes bedfellows of Pat Buchanann and
the<BR>
homosexual/priest/congressman from Massachusetts...
<P>
pure anarchy, by definition, does not work, anyway. forget
it. get <BR>
the concept out of your systems as it inflames everyone and
all <BR>
other reason is lost in the screaming and police batons.
<P>
Even Teddy Roosevelt called for the complete extermination
of<BR>
anarchists, to be hunted like vermin. give it up; or go to
your<BR>
private island and fly your rattlesnake flag. even Anguilla
will not<BR>
tolerate anarchists.
<P>
just give us our REAL constitutional rights as Franklin, Madison,
<BR>
Jefferson, Adams, and friends intended; give us constitutionalists
<BR>
on the Supreme Court, not bleeding hearts, statists, and central
<BR>
power freaks. get the Feds out of cradle to grave big government
and<BR>
let the people determine their religion and morality.
<P>
give us freedom of speech, freedom to bear arms, freedom from
<BR>
unreasonable searches, freedom not to incriminate ourselves,
and <BR>
repeal the 14th Amendment so we can have states' rights again.
<P>
if our Constitution were permitted to govern as it was intended,
and <BR>
the states obeyed the precepts endowed to not further limit
the<BR>
rights of the people, America would be the home of the free,
not big<BR>
government, not freeloaders and the welfare state; not the
leftovers<BR>
of a once great nation.
<P>
give us the rights Abraham Lincoln cherished lovingly:<BR>
"Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for
themselves."
<P>
let _them_, not me, live the downside.
<P>
George Washington, in his farewell address, warned:<BR>
"... change by usurpation; for through this, <BR>
in one instance, may be the instrument of good, <BR>
it is the customary weapon by which free <BR>
governments are destroyed."
<P>
cypherpunk philosopher kings: pick up your picks and shovels,
get <BR>
your hands dirty, and start digging in; it's going to be a
long and <BR>
difficult campaign and the tactics needed to expose F[reeh,uck]'s
<BR>
true intentions as the schill for the Clintons who are schills
<BR>
for the elitist leading the destruction of American democracy.
<P>
The Congressional compromise love match season isn't over
yet; the<BR>
schmoozers and lobbyists, like so many furry rats, still wander
the<BR>
dark halls and tunnels looking for the last, late in the season,
<BR>
clandestine and obscene fuck. any whore will do.
<P>
lobbyists have long reputations for selling out the interests
of<BR>
their paymasters; the lobbyists are so much a part of the
Washington<BR>
culture that they have _no_ morality or moral position --it
is all<BR>
about who they can claim to have influenced --what difference
does<BR>
it make if it is contrary to the client --the art of the deal,
<BR>
protect their own position and find newer, richer clients
--whores!<BR>
logrolling and porkbarrel voting --but never go home without
a deal;<BR>
used car salesmanship: get your man.
<P>
I can hear the lobbyists whining now as they are called on
the <BR>
carpet:<BR>
"aw, come on Mac, we got you a compromise from LEA
demands..."
<P>
never realizing that there is such an action as NO bill, they
sell <BR>
out half our rights blocking legislation which would never
happen.
<P>
they claim they got back half. what half? --some unknown half
that <BR>
we _never_ lost! that is why:<BR>
The 10 Commandments contain 297 words. The Bill of Rights
is <BR>
stated in 463 words. Lincoln's Gettysburg Address contains
266<BR>
words; and: <BR>
A recent federal directive to regulate the price of cabbage
<BR>
contains 26,911 words. (The Atlanta Journal)
<P>
send the quisling Neville Chamberlains to the gas chambers!
<P>
the public needs to be educated, not in crypto, but in the
horrors of <BR>
an oligarchy which intends to destroy the fundamental freedoms
on <BR>
which we stand.
<P>
publish his credit records; publish his medical records --tell
his<BR>
neighbors about his visits from Child Protective Services...
then<BR>
Joe Coach Potato will figure out he needs something
<P>
<B> AFTER he figures out there are fuckors and fuckees,
<BR>
and he's on the short end of that stick. [pardon my French]</B>
<P>
then, and only then, will the masses understand privacy --when
they <BR>
have lost it.
<P>
either we show the people before they lose everything to uncle,
<BR>
or... just dump it on the table to show everyone just how
much<BR>
uncle knows about _you_.
<P>
<B> Attila's thought for the day:<BR>
</B> Now, with a black jack mule you wish to harness, you
walk up, <BR>
look him in the eye, and hit him with a 2X4 over the left
eye. <BR>
If he blinks, hit him over the right eye! He'll cooperate.
<BR>
--so will politicians.
<P>
Louis F]reeh,uck], did you really state this hoping everyone
would <BR>
think you are joking? <BR>
"We are potentially the most dangerous agency in
the <BR>
country if we are not scrutinized carefully."
<P>
Louis F[reeh,uck], you obviously know that telling the truth,
before <BR>
the truth is really the truth, disarms your opposition since
they <BR>
can plainly see that it is not true.
<P>
there is a limit to what you can endure before you must stand
to <BR>
be counted --so I will loudly echo Tim's sentiment: <BR>
+<BR>
<B>+When Cypherpunks are called "terrorists," we will
have done our jobs</B>.<BR>
+<BR>
--<BR>
"Experience keeps a dear school, but fools will learn in
no other." <BR>
--Benjamin Franklin
<P>
<FONT SIZE=2>______________________________________________________________________
<BR>
"attila" 1024/C20B6905/23 D0 FA 7F 6A 8F 60 66 BC AF
AE 56 98 C0 D7 B0 </FONT>
<P>
<FONT SIZE=2>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<BR>
Version: 2.6.3i<BR>
Charset: latin1<BR>
Comment: No safety this side of the grave. Never was; never will
be</FONT>
<P>
<FONT SIZE=2>iQCVAwUBNDHgKr04kQrCC2kFAQHPpAQAj+ukWNVEXT+Zgf920g63wX9EZqT241dj
<BR>
KFqLQ9lBPZLRQydg/PMDcm8T0oI/RneVh51dep5v17IdJcPQT7MN+0CmX91k6e8m
<BR>
7Wsd+cNVovzDx6dRsC8ghMDB1QBZdBWW9553FzB89RMfilTikCyqmoP6Tub+23/V
<BR>
QywxUxa3slA=<BR>
=U4tV<BR>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<BR>
</FONT>
<P>
<B><FONT SIZE=2>Copyright "Anonymous TruthMonger <at@dev.null>"
<BR>
"Do you feel 'Cypher'…Punk? Well…do you?"
<BR>
</FONT></B>
<HR>
<P>
<CENTER><A HREF="http://bureau42.base.org/public/xenix">"The Xenix Chainsaw Massacre"</A></CENTER>
<P>
<CENTER><A HREF="http://bureau42.base.org/public/webworld">"WebWorld & the Mythical Circle of Eunuchs"</A></CENTER>
<P>
<CENTER><A HREF="http://bureau42.base.org/public/infowar3/">"InfoWar (Part III of 'The True Story of the InterNet')</A></CENTER>
<P>
<CENTER><A HREF="http://www.tigerteam.net/anarchy/texts/index.html">Soviet Union Sickle of Eunuchs Secret WebSite</A></CENTER>
<HR>
</BODY>
</HTML>
