[87134] in Cypherpunks
RE: Oxley Amendment
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Brock)
Thu Sep 25 22:34:11 1997
From: Michael Brock <hrast@flash.net>
To: "'Lucky Green'" <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
Cc: "cypherpunks@cyberpass.net" <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 20:51:35 -0500
Reply-To: Michael Brock <hrast@flash.net>
I agree that there should be *NO* rules about encryption... If the =
government wants to break encryption, buy the people who hack it and let =
them go just like every other good industrial country...
M.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lucky Green [SMTP:shamrock@cypherpunks.to]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 1997 9:17 AM
To: Michael Brock
Cc: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Oxley Amendment
On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, Michael Brock wrote:
>=20
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
> I wonder if Mr. Solomon of NY will rethink his decision to not bring=20
> up SAFE without Oxley to the entire House after the unprecedented=20
> coaltion of companies and individual groups that came together to=20
> make sure that mandatory key recovery stays a "1984" like dream. I=20
> find it incomprehensible that one man, would block the introduction=20
> of this bill, after it being proved that this is what his=20
> constituents want....
What in the world makes you believe that Mr. Solomon's constituents =
would
want SAFE to go the the floor? SAFE *must* be defeated, with or without
the Oxley ammendment.
-- Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> PGP encrypted email preferred.
"Tonga? Where the hell is Tonga? They have Cypherpunks there?"
