[86863] in Cypherpunks
Re: directed speech free? request for opinions.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Hedges)
Sat Sep 20 14:20:59 1997
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 10:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mark Hedges <hedges@sirius.infonex.com>
To: Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
cc: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
In-Reply-To: <v03007803b0488b2d954c@[163.176.132.90]>
Reply-To: Mark Hedges <hedges@sirius.infonex.com>
I don't have the law code available. I was told by an attorney that the
particular passage says this is the case. I would like to challenge this
passage. I will get back with the particular code section and text.
Mark Hedges
On Fri, 19 Sep 1997, Lee Tien wrote:
>At 2:16 AM -0800 9/19/97, Mark Hedges wrote:
>>I have seen California law code which seems to indicate that speech
>>directed at an individual is not covered under the first amendment.
>>
>>If you have any thoughts on the matter, please send opinions (not legal
>>advice, of course, if you are a lawyer). Also, if you know of any speech
>>rights scholars or lawyers willing to answer a few related questions for
>>free, I would appreciate the pointer.
>
>I'm confused. What in California law makes you think that the First
>Amendment doesn't apply unless you speak to more than one person? Assuming
>that's what you mean by "speech directed at an individual."
>
>Lee
>
>
>
