[83135] in Cypherpunks
Re: Making Imaginary Sex Illegal
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Unprivileged user)
Tue Jul 15 18:22:42 1997
From: Unprivileged user <nobody@www.video-collage.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 17:35:11 -0400
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
In-Reply-To: <19970715115457.07611@bywater.songbird.com>
Reply-To: Unprivileged user <nobody@www.video-collage.com>
On Tue, 15 Jul 1997, Kent Crispin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 1997 at 12:25:55PM -0400, Unprivileged user wrote:
> > But to return to the cypher aspect, what about altering existing images so
> > that they are unidentifiable as to whether they are from real acts or
> > truly the products of an imagination. Will we now need someone from the
> > government to certify the kiddie porn isn't real?
>
> Yes, that's the logical next step -- Government Approved Porn (GAP).
> Perhaps we could get Senator Hatch to sponsor a bill?
>
> The constitutional implications are staggering.
Actually, Government Approved Kiddieporn, or GAK. Isn't Hatch already for
GAK?
--- reply to tzeruch - at - ceddec - dot - com ---
