[82264] in Cypherpunks
Re: Hettinga's e$yllogism
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anonymous)
Sun Jun 22 18:46:31 1997
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 00:20:06 +0200 (MET DST)
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
From: nobody@replay.com (Anonymous)
Reply-To: nobody@replay.com (Anonymous)
> Digital Commerce *is* Financial Cryptography,
> Financial Cryptography *is* Strong Cryptography,
> therefore,
> Digital Commerce *is* Strong Cryptography.
> and, therefore,
> No Strong Cryptography, no Digital Commerce.
Why can't escrowed ecash support digital commerce? Strong crypto with
a government backdoor. That's what you're offered. Prove it can't work.
Anon
